Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Obstetric and Gynecologic Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;48(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
During surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the most important prognostic factor is the absence of residual tumor. Invisible microscopic peritoneal metastasis (mPM) are not removed during surgery and can be responsible of peritoneal recurrences. The aim of this current systematic review is to assess the role of fluorescence in evaluating mPM in EOC. We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. MeSH terms for fluorescence, EOC and peritoneal carcinomatosis were combined and not restricted to the English language. The final search was performed on September 1rst, 2021. The primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence. We also reviewed the different techniques used. Eighty-seven studies were identified. Of these, 10 were included for analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence ranged between 66.7-100% and 54.2-100%, respectively. Most importantly, the negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 90 to 100% Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no consensus was reached concerning the optimal use of fluorescence in terms of type of dye, type and timing of injection and imager to use. No adverse event was reported. Fluorescence can safely be used in EOC to evaluate mPM with a high NPV. However, a randomized controlled trial is needed to homogenize current practice.
在高级上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的手术中,最重要的预后因素是无残留肿瘤。肉眼不可见的微腹膜转移(mPM)在手术中未被清除,可能是腹膜复发的原因。本系统评价的目的是评估荧光在评估 EOC 中 mPM 中的作用。我们使用 PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库中的文献引文进行了系统评价。荧光、EOC 和腹膜癌病的 MeSH 术语进行了组合,且不限于英语。最终搜索于 2021 年 9 月 1 日进行。主要结果是确定荧光的诊断准确性。我们还回顾了使用的不同技术。确定了 87 项研究。其中 10 项被纳入分析。荧光的灵敏度和特异性分别在 66.7-100%和 54.2-100%之间。最重要的是,阴性预测值(NPV)范围为 90-100%。由于研究的异质性,关于荧光在染料类型、注射类型和时间以及使用的成像仪方面的最佳使用,尚未达成共识。没有报告不良事件。荧光可安全用于 EOC 以评估 mPM,具有高 NPV。然而,需要进行随机对照试验来统一当前的实践。