Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin (Dr. Travieso), Austin, Texas.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (Mr. Kamdar).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Jun;29(6):776-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
To evaluate whether the addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with changes in perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy for benign indications.
Retrospective cohort study.
Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database.
Patients who underwent hysterectomy between July 2012 and June 2015 when VTE prophylaxis data were collected.
Patients who received mechanical prophylaxis alone were compared with those receiving dual prophylaxis (mechanical and pharmacologic). Minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) included laparoscopic, vaginal, robotic-assisted, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and were analyzed separately from abdominal (ABD) hysterectomy.
Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding because of the differences in demographic and perioperative characteristics. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss (EBL). The secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative blood transfusion, VTE, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and death. There were 1803 matched pairs in the MIS analysis. In the ABD hysterectomy analysis, 2:1 matching was used with a total of 1168 patients receiving mechanical prophylaxis alone matched to 616 patients receiving dual prophylaxis. EBL was higher by 54.5 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9-92.1) in those receiving dual prophylaxis in the ABD hysterectomy analysis but did not differ between groups in the MIS analysis. Operative time was significantly longer with dual prophylaxis in both MIS (18.3 minutes; 95% CI, 13.8-22.8) and ABD (15.3 minutes; 95% CI, 9.0-21.6) surgical approaches. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes.
The addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis in benign hysterectomy was associated with longer operative time, regardless of surgical approach and increased EBL in ABD hysterectomy. Given very low rates of VTE, no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and possible harm, it seems reasonable to encourage individualized rather than routine use of pharmacologic prophylaxis in patients undergoing benign hysterectomy receiving mechanical prophylaxis.
评估在良性指征行子宫切除术时,静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的药物预防与机械预防联合应用是否会改变围手术期结局。
回顾性队列研究。
密歇根手术质量协作数据库。
2012 年 7 月至 2015 年 6 月期间接受 VTE 预防数据采集的子宫切除术患者。
比较仅接受机械预防的患者与接受双重预防(机械和药物)的患者。微创手术包括腹腔镜、阴道、机器人辅助和腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术,与腹式(ABD)子宫切除术分开进行分析。
使用倾向评分匹配来最小化因人口统计学和围手术期特征差异导致的混杂因素。主要结局是估计失血量(EBL)。次要结局是手术时间、术后输血、VTE、手术部位感染、再次手术、再次入院和死亡。微创手术分析中有 1803 对匹配对。在 ABD 子宫切除术分析中,采用 2:1 匹配,共有 1168 例接受机械预防的患者与 616 例接受双重预防的患者相匹配。在 ABD 子宫切除术分析中,接受双重预防的患者 EBL 增加 54.5 毫升(95%置信区间[CI],16.9-92.1),但在微创手术分析中两组间无差异。在两种手术方式下,双重预防均显著延长手术时间:微创手术 18.3 分钟(95%CI,13.8-22.8)和 ABD 手术 15.3 分钟(95%CI,9.0-21.6)。其他次要结局无差异。
在良性子宫切除术中,机械预防联合药物预防与手术时间延长有关,无论手术方式如何,且 ABD 子宫切除术的 EBL 增加。鉴于 VTE 的发生率非常低,其他围手术期结局无差异,且可能存在危害,对于接受机械预防的良性子宫切除术患者,鼓励个体化而非常规使用药物预防似乎是合理的。