Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, UK.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, UK.
Midwifery. 2022 May;108:103285. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103285. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
Teamwork is essential for providing safe, effective and women-centred maternity care and several high profile investigations have highlighted the adverse conseqences of dysfuntional teamwork. Maternity teams may need support to identify the most relevant intervention(s) for improving teamwork.
To identify and describe current 'off-the-shelf' teamwork interventions freely or commercially available to support improvements to teamworking in UK maternity services and conduct a gap analysis to identify areas for future development.
Rapid scoping review METHODS: A multi-component search process was used to identify teamwork interventions, comprising: (1) bibliographic database search (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MIDRS, NICE evidence research database); (2) identification of relevant policies and UK reports; and (3) expert input from key stakeholders (e.g., maternity service clinicians, managers, policymakers, and report authors). Data were extracted including the scope and content of each intervention and a gap analysis used to map interventions to the integrated team effectiveness model (ITEM) and structure level (macro, meso, micro) and results presented narratively.
Ten interventions were identified. Interventions were heterogeneous in their purpose and scope; six were classified as training courses, three were tools involving observational or diagnostics instruments, and one was a programme involving training and organisational re-design. Interventions were focused on teamwork in obstetric emergencies (n = 5), enhancing routine care (n = 4) or understanding workplace cultures (n = 1). Users of interventions could vary, from whole organisations, to departments, to individual team members. All interventions focused on micro (e.g., team leadership, communication, decision-making, cohesion, and problem solving), with two also focused on meso aspects of teamwork (resources, organisational goals). Evidence for intervention effective on objective outcomes was limited.
Interventions that address key aspects of teamworking are available, particularly for improving safety in obstetric emergency situations. Most interventions, however, are focused on micro features, ignoring the meso (organisational) and macro (systems) features that may also impact on team effectiveness. Evidence-based team improvement interventions that address these gaps are needed. Such interventions would support team ownership of quality improvement, leading to improvements in outcomes for service users, staff and organisations.
团队合作对于提供安全、有效和以妇女为中心的产科护理至关重要,几项备受瞩目的调查强调了功能失调的团队合作的不利后果。产科团队可能需要支持来确定最相关的干预措施,以改善团队合作。
确定并描述目前英国产科服务中免费或商业提供的支持改善团队合作的现成团队合作干预措施,并进行差距分析,以确定未来发展的领域。
快速范围审查
使用多组件搜索过程来确定团队合作干预措施,包括:(1)文献数据库搜索(Medline、PsycINFO、CINAHL、MIDRS、NICE 证据研究数据库);(2)确定相关政策和英国报告;(3)来自关键利益相关者的专家投入(例如,产科服务临床医生、经理、政策制定者和报告作者)。提取的数据包括每个干预措施的范围和内容,并使用差距分析将干预措施映射到综合团队效能模型(ITEM)和结构级别(宏观、中观、微观),并以叙述的方式呈现结果。
确定了 10 项干预措施。干预措施在目的和范围上存在差异;其中 6 项被归类为培训课程,3 项是涉及观察或诊断工具的工具,1 项是涉及培训和组织重新设计的计划。干预措施侧重于产科急症中的团队合作(n=5)、增强常规护理(n=4)或理解工作场所文化(n=1)。干预措施的使用者可能有所不同,从整个组织到部门,再到个别团队成员。所有干预措施都侧重于微观方面(例如,团队领导、沟通、决策、凝聚力和解决问题),其中两项还侧重于团队合作的中观方面(资源、组织目标)。干预措施对客观结果的有效性证据有限。
现有的干预措施可解决团队合作的关键方面,特别是在改善产科急症中的安全性方面。然而,大多数干预措施都侧重于微观特征,忽略了可能也会影响团队效能的中观(组织)和宏观(系统)特征。需要有循证的团队改进干预措施来解决这些差距。此类干预措施将支持团队对质量改进的拥有权,从而改善服务用户、员工和组织的结果。