• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队评估与测评质量改进措施(TEAM-QI)的开发及产科团队的概念验证测试

Development of the Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure Quality Improvement (TEAM-QI) and Proof-Of-Concept Testing in Maternity Teams.

作者信息

Beck Sarah, Harris Jenny, Green James, Lamb Benjamin W, Aref-Adib Mehrnoosh, Bick Debra, Taylor Cath

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.

Department of Urology, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70049. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70049.

DOI:10.1111/nhs.70049
PMID:39900545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11790520/
Abstract

Poor teamwork is often implicated in serious healthcare delivery failings, leading to calls for effective team improvement interventions. Taking a complex, adaptive systems perspective, we adapted an oncology team quality improvement program to make it appropriate for other areas of clinical care. Study phases included: (1) meetings with National Health Service, policy and service user representatives (n = 19), a rapid review of existing maternity teamwork interventions, and mapping of the proposed program content to an evidence-based model of team effectiveness; (2) feasibility and acceptability testing of the team questionnaire component, and content analysis of free-text responses with four maternity teams within two NHS Trusts (n = 26). Meetings with representatives highlighted the importance of non-punitive, continuous team-led assessment, and the ability to compare performance to similar teams while enabling adaptability to different team types. Program content mapped well to known components of team effectiveness. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was acceptable (Cronbach alpha = 0.79-0.92). Most team members (76.9%) reported benefits in identifying priorities for improvement. Preliminary proof of concept was supported but larger-scale evaluation including testing in other clinical areas is warranted.

摘要

糟糕的团队协作往往与严重的医疗服务失误有关,这引发了对有效的团队改进干预措施的需求。从复杂适应系统的角度出发,我们对一个肿瘤学团队质量改进项目进行了调整,使其适用于临床护理的其他领域。研究阶段包括:(1)与国民保健制度、政策和服务用户代表(n = 19)会面,快速回顾现有的产科团队协作干预措施,并将拟议项目内容映射到基于证据的团队有效性模型;(2)对团队问卷部分进行可行性和可接受性测试,并对两个国民保健制度信托基金内的四个产科团队的自由文本回复进行内容分析(n = 26)。与代表们的会面强调了非惩罚性的、持续的团队主导评估的重要性,以及在使团队能够适应不同类型的同时,将绩效与类似团队进行比较的能力。项目内容与团队有效性的已知组成部分映射良好。问卷的内部一致性是可以接受的(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.79 - 0.92)。大多数团队成员(76.9%)报告称在确定改进重点方面有收获。概念验证得到了支持,但需要进行更大规模的评估,包括在其他临床领域进行测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/f51118887a21/NHS-27-e70049-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/3168c411376b/NHS-27-e70049-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/a135df7454d6/NHS-27-e70049-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/f51118887a21/NHS-27-e70049-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/3168c411376b/NHS-27-e70049-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/a135df7454d6/NHS-27-e70049-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b260/11790520/f51118887a21/NHS-27-e70049-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure Quality Improvement (TEAM-QI) and Proof-Of-Concept Testing in Maternity Teams.团队评估与测评质量改进措施(TEAM-QI)的开发及产科团队的概念验证测试
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70049. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70049.
2
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
3
Acceptability of a complex team-based quality improvement intervention for transient ischemic attack: a mixed-methods study.接受基于复杂团队的短暂性脑缺血发作质量改进干预的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06318-2.
4
Improving teamwork in maternity services: A rapid review of interventions.改善产科服务中的团队合作:干预措施的快速综述。
Midwifery. 2022 May;108:103285. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103285. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
5
Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study.加强英国国民保健制度产科服务中的公开披露:DISCERN 现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(22):1-159. doi: 10.3310/YTDF8015.
6
Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.开发和测试 TEAM(团队评估和评估工具),这是一种自我评估工具,旨在改善癌症多学科团队合作。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4019-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
7
Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study.与精神卫生保健中质量改进合作的影响相关的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jan 9;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1.
8
Effects of team-based quality improvement learning on two teams providing dementia care.基于团队的质量改进学习对两个提供痴呆症护理的团队的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 24;8(2):e000500. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000500. eCollection 2019.
9
Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer services in England and Wales: a follow-up assessment of progress and remaining challenges.英格兰和威尔士食管癌和胃癌服务的重组:进展及尚存挑战的后续评估
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jan 10;7:24. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-24.
10
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtually the same? Examining the impact of the COVID-19 related shift to virtual lung cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the UK National Health Service: a mixed methods study.几乎相同?在英国国家医疗服务体系中,考察与 COVID-19 相关的转变对虚拟肺癌多学科团队会议的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 16;13(6):e065494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065494.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Improving teamwork in maternity services: A rapid review of interventions.
改善产科服务中的团队合作:干预措施的快速综述。
Midwifery. 2022 May;108:103285. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103285. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
4
Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework.爱荷华州可持续性框架实施情况。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 4;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01157-5.
5
Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.确定可行策略:运用基于整合性实施研究框架(CFIR)的访谈来评估一项旨在改善结直肠癌筛查的多层次干预措施的实施情况。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 May 31;2(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00150-9.
6
A multi-method evaluation of the implementation of a cancer teamwork assessment and feedback improvement programme (MDT-FIT) across a large integrated cancer system.多方法评估在大型综合癌症系统中实施癌症团队协作评估和反馈改进计划(MDT-FIT)的情况。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1240-1252. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3719. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队合作究竟有多有效?医疗团队中团队合作与绩效之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e028280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280.
8
Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift.研究卫生服务研究中的复杂性:迫切需要一场姗姗来迟的范式转变。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4.
9
Using the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework to assess the impact of public involvement in a mental health research context: A reflective case study.运用公众参与影响评估框架评估公众参与心理健康研究的影响:一个反思性案例研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):950-963. doi: 10.1111/hex.12688. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
10
Development and testing of the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting observational tool (MDT-MOT).癌症多学科团队会议观察工具(MDT-MOT)的开发与测试。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):332-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw030. Epub 2016 Apr 15.