Beck Sarah, Harris Jenny, Green James, Lamb Benjamin W, Aref-Adib Mehrnoosh, Bick Debra, Taylor Cath
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Department of Urology, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70049. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70049.
Poor teamwork is often implicated in serious healthcare delivery failings, leading to calls for effective team improvement interventions. Taking a complex, adaptive systems perspective, we adapted an oncology team quality improvement program to make it appropriate for other areas of clinical care. Study phases included: (1) meetings with National Health Service, policy and service user representatives (n = 19), a rapid review of existing maternity teamwork interventions, and mapping of the proposed program content to an evidence-based model of team effectiveness; (2) feasibility and acceptability testing of the team questionnaire component, and content analysis of free-text responses with four maternity teams within two NHS Trusts (n = 26). Meetings with representatives highlighted the importance of non-punitive, continuous team-led assessment, and the ability to compare performance to similar teams while enabling adaptability to different team types. Program content mapped well to known components of team effectiveness. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was acceptable (Cronbach alpha = 0.79-0.92). Most team members (76.9%) reported benefits in identifying priorities for improvement. Preliminary proof of concept was supported but larger-scale evaluation including testing in other clinical areas is warranted.
糟糕的团队协作往往与严重的医疗服务失误有关,这引发了对有效的团队改进干预措施的需求。从复杂适应系统的角度出发,我们对一个肿瘤学团队质量改进项目进行了调整,使其适用于临床护理的其他领域。研究阶段包括:(1)与国民保健制度、政策和服务用户代表(n = 19)会面,快速回顾现有的产科团队协作干预措施,并将拟议项目内容映射到基于证据的团队有效性模型;(2)对团队问卷部分进行可行性和可接受性测试,并对两个国民保健制度信托基金内的四个产科团队的自由文本回复进行内容分析(n = 26)。与代表们的会面强调了非惩罚性的、持续的团队主导评估的重要性,以及在使团队能够适应不同类型的同时,将绩效与类似团队进行比较的能力。项目内容与团队有效性的已知组成部分映射良好。问卷的内部一致性是可以接受的(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.79 - 0.92)。大多数团队成员(76.9%)报告称在确定改进重点方面有收获。概念验证得到了支持,但需要进行更大规模的评估,包括在其他临床领域进行测试。