Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006975.
It has been nearly 2 years since the first case of COVID-19 was reported. Governments worldwide have introduced numerous non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to combat this disease. Many of these NPIs were designed in response to initial outbreaks but are unsustainable in the long term. Governments are exploring how to adjust their current NPIs to resume normal activities while effectively protecting their population. As one of the most controversial NPIs, the implementation of travel restrictions varies across regions. Some governments have abandoned their previous travel restrictions because of the induced costs to society and on the economy. Other areas, including Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region of China) and Singapore, continue employing these NPIs as a long-term disease prevention tactic. However, the multidimensional impacts of travel restrictions require careful consideration of how to apply restrictions more appropriately. We have proposed an adapted framework to examine Hong Kong and Singapore's travel restrictions. We aimed to study these two regions' experiences in balancing disease control efforts with easing the burden on lives and livelihoods. Based on the experiences of Hong Kong and Singapore, we have outlined six policy recommendations to serve as the cornerstone for future research and policy practices.
自首例 COVID-19 病例报告以来,已经过去了近 2 年。全球各国政府已采取了许多非药物干预措施(NPIs)来对抗这种疾病。这些 NPI 中的许多措施是针对最初的疫情爆发而设计的,但从长期来看是不可持续的。各国政府正在探索如何调整当前的 NPI,以恢复正常活动,同时有效保护其人民。作为最具争议的 NPI 之一,旅行限制的实施因地区而异。一些政府由于对社会和经济造成的相关成本而放弃了以前的旅行限制。其他地区,包括中国香港(特别行政区)和新加坡,继续将这些 NPI 作为长期疾病预防策略。然而,旅行限制的多维影响需要仔细考虑如何更适当地实施限制。我们提出了一个适应性框架来检查香港和新加坡的旅行限制。我们的目的是研究这两个地区在平衡疾病控制工作与减轻生活和生计负担方面的经验。基于香港和新加坡的经验,我们概述了六项政策建议,作为未来研究和政策实践的基础。