Suppr超能文献

厄瓜多尔安第斯地区与婴儿线性生长相关因素的性别和基于性别的分析。

A sex- and gender-based analysis of factors associated with linear growth in infants in Ecuadorian Andes.

机构信息

Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Instituto de Investigación en Salud Y Nutrición, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06806-3.

Abstract

Although female infants may have an early life biological advantage over males, gendered treatment can alter health outcomes. Ecuador has an unusually high ratio of male to female infant mortality, but gender norms have been reported to favor boys. This analysis of baseline data from the Lulun Project, a randomized controlled trial conducted in rural Andean communities of Ecuador, investigates the roles of sex and gender in undernutrition among infants 6 to 9 months of age. Twenty-four-hour recall frequencies were used to assess dietary intake. Food outcome models were analyzed as prevalence ratios calculated using a binomial distribution with a log link or robust Poisson regression. Linear regression was used to analyze the continuous growth outcome length-for-age z score. Socioeconomic and health history variables were comparable between male and female infants. Boys were more often fed liquids other than breastmilk within their first 3 days of life (17.1% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.026). Compared with girls, boys were less likely to be fed eggs by 33% (95% CI 0.46, 0.96), cheese, yogurt, or other milk products by 40% (95% CI 0.39, 0.92), yellow fruit by 44% (95% CI 0.33, 0.97), water by 37% (95% CI 0.45, 0.88), thin porridge by 29% (95% CI 0.56, 0.92), and tea without milk by 67% (95% CI 0.11, 0.99). Prevalence of boys with an adequate dietary diversity score (≥ 4) was reduced by 27% relative to girls (95% CI 0.54, 0.99). Males fared worse in length-for-age z scores (- 2.16 vs. - 1.56, P = 0.000), weight-for-age z scores (- 0.86 vs. - 0.33, P = 0.002), prevalence of stunting (50.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.000), and plasma concentrations of dimethylglycine (1.25 vs. 1.65 µg/mL, P = 0.021). After adjusting for demographic, caregiver perceptions of appetite, and biological factors, length-for-age z score for a male child was 0.62 units lower than for a female (95% CI - 0.98, - 0.26). Male infants were shown to receive lower quality complementary foods and have worse anthropometric measures than female infants.Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02446873. Registered February 28, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02446873 .

摘要

尽管女婴在生命早期可能具有优于男婴的生物学优势,但性别化的待遇会改变健康结果。厄瓜多尔的男婴与女婴死亡率之比异常高,但据报道,性别规范偏向男孩。本研究分析了农村安第斯社区厄瓜多尔的“Lulun 项目”基线数据,该项目是一项随机对照试验,旨在研究性别在 6 至 9 个月龄婴儿营养不良中的作用。24 小时回忆频率用于评估饮食摄入。食物结果模型被分析为使用二项式分布和对数链接或稳健泊松回归计算的患病率比。线性回归用于分析连续生长结果的年龄别身长 z 评分。男婴和女婴的社会经济和健康史变量相似。男婴在生命的头 3 天内更常饮用母乳以外的液体(17.1%对 5.2%,P=0.026)。与女孩相比,男孩不太可能在 33%的时间内喂食鸡蛋(95%CI 0.46,0.96),40%的时间内喂食奶酪、酸奶或其他奶制品(95%CI 0.39,0.92),44%的时间内喂食黄色水果(95%CI 0.33,0.97),37%的时间内喂食水(95%CI 0.45,0.88),29%的时间内喂食稀薄粥(95%CI 0.56,0.92),67%的时间内喂食不含牛奶的茶(95%CI 0.11,0.99)。与女孩相比,男婴获得足够饮食多样性评分(≥4)的比例降低了 27%(95%CI 0.54,0.99)。男性在年龄别身长 z 评分(-2.16 对-1.56,P=0.000)、年龄别体重 z 评分(-0.86 对-0.33,P=0.002)、发育迟缓患病率(50.6%对 23.4%,P=0.000)和血浆二甲氨基乙醇浓度(1.25 对 1.65μg/mL,P=0.021)方面的表现更差。在调整人口统计学、照顾者对食欲的看法和生物学因素后,男童的年龄别身长 z 评分比女童低 0.62 个单位(95%CI-0.98,-0.26)。与女婴相比,男婴接受的补充食品质量较低,身体测量指标较差。试验注册临床Trials.gov,NCT02446873。2015 年 2 月 28 日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02446873。

相似文献

4
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

本文引用的文献

8
One-Carbon Metabolism in Health and Disease.健康与疾病中的一碳代谢
Cell Metab. 2017 Jan 10;25(1):27-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
9
Childhood stunting: a global perspective.儿童发育迟缓:全球视角
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 May;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12-26. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12231.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验