Litwin Andrew, Coulter Aixa Perez, Romanelli John, Tirabassi Michael
Baystate Medical Center, General Surgery, 26 Irvington St., Springfield, MA, 01108, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8421-8429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09102-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
The objective of this study is to assess surgical outcomes following the initial use of laparoscopy versus laparotomy when managing patients with hollow viscus injuries due to trauma.
Using the database from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program we identified all patients from 2015-2017 with ICD-10 Diagnosis codes for hollow viscus trauma. Types of procedures were identified by ICD-10 PCS codes. Patient outcomes were stratified by major trauma(ISS > 15) and minor trauma. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and categorical variables compared by Chi-Square. Analysis performed using STATA 16.
We identified 16,284 patients that matched inclusion criteria within the study time frame. Of those, 1986 patients received a surgical intervention, 1911(96%) were open and 75(4%) were laparoscopic. In blunt trauma there were 106 diagnostic procedures, 87(82%) were open and 19(18%) were laparoscopic. There were 574 therapeutic procedures, 543(95%) were open and 31(5%) were laparoscopic. In penetrating trauma there were 223 diagnostic procedures, 215(96%) were open and 8(4%) were laparoscopic. There were 1039 therapeutic procedures for penetrating trauma, 1023(98%) were open and 16(2%) were laparoscopic. For minor trauma, mean length of stay(days) after open surgery was 5 while for laparoscopy it was 2 (p = 0.04). There were 203 complications noted in the open group and 7 in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.19). For major trauma, mean length of stay(days) after open surgery was 5 and 6 for laparoscopy p = 0.54). There were 242 complications in the open group and 1 in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.07). There was no noted significant difference noted in the disposition at discharge in either group in both major and minor trauma.
For those that required surgery for hollow viscous injury, laparoscopy appeared to be safe, had less adverse outcomes and was underutilized, particularly when only a diagnostic procedure was required.
本研究的目的是评估在处理因创伤导致中空脏器损伤的患者时,初次使用腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的手术效果。
利用美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目的数据库,我们确定了2015年至2017年所有具有国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)中空脏器创伤诊断编码的患者。手术类型通过ICD - 10手术操作编码(PCS)确定。患者结局按严重创伤(损伤严重度评分[ISS]>15)和轻度创伤进行分层。连续变量采用方差分析进行比较,分类变量采用卡方检验进行比较。使用STATA 16进行分析。
我们在研究时间范围内确定了16284例符合纳入标准的患者。其中,1986例患者接受了手术干预,1911例(96%)为开腹手术,75例(4%)为腹腔镜手术。在钝性创伤中,有106例诊断性手术,87例(82%)为开腹手术,19例(18%)为腹腔镜手术。有574例治疗性手术,543例(95%)为开腹手术,31例(5%)为腹腔镜手术。在穿透性创伤中,有223例诊断性手术,215例(96%)为开腹手术,8例(4%)为腹腔镜手术。有1039例穿透性创伤的治疗性手术,1023例(98%)为开腹手术,16例(2%)为腹腔镜手术。对于轻度创伤,开腹手术后的平均住院天数为5天,而腹腔镜手术为2天(p = 0.04)。开腹组有203例并发症,腹腔镜组有7例(p = 0.19)。对于严重创伤,开腹手术后的平均住院天数为5天,腹腔镜手术为6天(p = 0.54)。开腹组有242例并发症,腹腔镜组有1例(p = 0.07)。在严重创伤和轻度创伤的两组患者出院时的处置方面均未发现显著差异。
对于那些因中空脏器损伤需要手术治疗的患者,腹腔镜手术似乎是安全的,不良结局较少且未得到充分利用,特别是在仅需要诊断性手术时。