Suppr超能文献

全球范围内基于证据的心房颤动治疗:最新 ESC、AHA/ACC/HRS 和 CCS 心房颤动管理指南比较。

Evidence-based treatment of atrial fibrillation around the globe: comparison of the latest ESC, AHA/ACC/HRS, and CCS guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiology II (Electrophysiology), University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 11;23(2):56. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2302056.

Abstract

Recent versions of evidence-based guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACC/HRS), and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CCS). As all societies refer to the same multicentric and usually multinational studies, the similarities undoubtedly outweigh the differences. Nonetheless, interesting differences can often be found in details, which are usually based on a different assessment of the same study, the availability of data in relation to the publication date and local preferences and availabilities of certain cardiovascular drugs. The following article aims at lining out these similarities and differences.

摘要

最近,欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)、美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)和心律学会(HRS)以及加拿大心血管学会/加拿大心律学会(CCS)合作发布了关于心房颤动(AF)管理的循证指南的最新版本。由于所有学会都参考了相同的多中心且通常是跨国的研究,因此相似之处无疑多于差异。尽管如此,在细节上经常可以找到有趣的差异,这些差异通常基于对同一研究的不同评估、与发表日期相关的数据可用性以及当地对某些心血管药物的偏好和可获得性。本文旨在阐明这些相似之处和差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验