• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后行腔内吻合与腔外吻合:长期随访时的发病率比较。

Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: morbidity comparison at long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Unit of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Infermi Hospital of Rimini, AUSL Della Romagna, Rimini, Italy -

Unit of General Surgery2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy -

出版信息

Minerva Surg. 2022 Dec;77(6):531-535. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09281-4. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09281-4
PMID:35230035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy is nowadays considered the gold standard for treatment of malignant right colon disease. What is still debated is instead the choice between intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to compare morbidity and the long-term results between these two techniques.

METHODS

This retrospective, double-center cohort study was performed between January 2013 and December 2014. A total of 197 patients were enrolled after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for malignant disease. The extracorporeal anastomosis group (ECA) included 95 patients, while the intracorporeal anastomosis group (ICA) included 102 patients. All patients were followed up for 5 years after surgery. Data analysis was performed in February 2021.

RESULTS

The ICA group showed a reduced rate of non-surgical complications Clavien-Dindo grade I-II (10% vs. 31%; P=0.001) as well as a lower rate of wound infections (2% vs. 12%; P=0.01). Most importantly, a decreased risk of incisional hernias in a five-year follow-up period (1% vs. 8%; P=0.01) has been underlined.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracorporeal anastomosis technique after totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy showed better outcomes as it significantly reduces the risk for short and long-term complications, namely, incisional hernias.

摘要

背景

微创右半结肠切除术如今被认为是治疗右半结肠癌的金标准。但仍存在争议的是选择体内吻合还是体外吻合。本研究旨在比较这两种技术的发病率和长期结果。

方法

这是一项回顾性、双中心队列研究,于 2013 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月进行。197 例腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗恶性疾病的患者被纳入研究。体外吻合组(ECA)包括 95 例,而体内吻合组(ICA)包括 102 例。所有患者在手术后随访 5 年。数据分析于 2021 年 2 月进行。

结果

ICA 组非手术并发症 Clavien-Dindo 分级 I-II 发生率较低(10% vs. 31%;P=0.001),切口感染发生率也较低(2% vs. 12%;P=0.01)。最重要的是,在 5 年的随访期间,切口疝的风险降低(1% vs. 8%;P=0.01)。

结论

全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后的体内吻合技术具有更好的效果,因为它显著降低了短期和长期并发症的风险,如切口疝。

相似文献

1
Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: morbidity comparison at long-term follow-up.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后行腔内吻合与腔外吻合:长期随访时的发病率比较。
Minerva Surg. 2022 Dec;77(6):531-535. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09281-4. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study with Retrospective Control on Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis.腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术切口疝:一种腔内心与腔外吻合的前瞻性研究与回顾性对照
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):113-119. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0453. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.腹腔镜下右半结肠切除术伴体内吻合术:与体外吻合术相比的短期和长期益处。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4684-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Intracorporeal Anastomoses in Minimally Invasive Right Colectomies Are Associated With Fewer Incisional Hernias and Shorter Length of Stay.微创右结肠切除术的体内吻合与更少的切口疝和更短的住院时间相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):685-692. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001612.
5
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右半结肠切除术中体内吻合与体外吻合的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
6
Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: An Observational Cohort Study.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内吻合与体外吻合的比较:一项观察性队列研究
World J Surg. 2023 Mar;47(3):785-795. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06834-0. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence.微创手术右半结肠切除术中腔内吻合与腔外吻合的随机对照试验的荟萃分析:证据水平升级。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 30;38(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04445-2.
8
Extent of Lymph Node Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Right Hemicolectomy.淋巴结清扫范围:右半结肠切除术中经体内吻合与经体外吻合的回顾性队列比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Nov;33(11):1058-1063. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0246. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
9
Clinical Outcomes after Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中经体内吻合与体外吻合的临床结局比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 29;60(7):1073. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071073.
10
Pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection: retrospective multicentre study.腹腔镜横结肠癌切除术中体外与体内吻合的病理和围手术期结果:回顾性多中心研究。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad045.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of different surgical techniques and anastomosis methods in short-term outcomes of right colon cancer: a network meta-analysis of open surgery, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis.不同手术技术和吻合方法对右结肠癌短期预后的比较:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术联合体外和体内吻合的网状Meta分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):309-325. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02096-2. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内与体外吻合的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):375-396. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01737-8. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
Safety and efficacy of totally minimally invasive right colectomy in the obese patients: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.完全微创右半结肠切除术治疗肥胖患者的安全性和有效性:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1281-1290. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01298-2. Epub 2022 May 31.