Department of Surgery, Azienda USL of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):113-119. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0453. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
Incisional hernias often occur after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but the precise risk factors are not fully understood. This study's primary aim was to compare the incidence of incisional hernias following laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomotic reconstruction (ICA) versus extracorporeal anastomotic reconstruction (ECA). A cohort study compared two groups of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer following a standardized perioperative enhanced recovery program (ERP): a prospective group underwent ICA from January 2018 to February 2020 and a retrospective group underwent ECA from January 2013 to December 2016. The presence of incisional hernias was assessed by reviewing patients' follow-up computed tomography scans or evaluating the patients by telephone interview or outpatient office visit and diagnostic imaging. Secondary objectives included the hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rate, reoperation, and mortality. The study included 89 patients who had laparoscopic right colectomy for malignant colon neoplasms. Among these, 48 underwent ECA (ECA group), and 41 had ICA (ICA group). At a median follow-up of 36 months, incisional hernia was observed in 1 patient (2.4%) in the ICA group, in contrast to 11 (22.9%) confirmed cases in the ECA group ( = .010). The length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups (5 days versus 4 days; = .064). The two groups showed similarities in terms of postoperative complications ( = .093), hospital readmission ( = .999), and the rate of reoperation within 30 days ( = .461). The ICA technique was associated with a reduced risk of incisional hernias compared with the ECA technique, with similar outcomes in short-term postoperative complications and overall patient recovery.
切口疝常发生在腹腔镜结直肠手术后,但确切的危险因素尚不完全清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术采用腔内吻合重建(ICA)与腔外吻合重建(ECA)的切口疝发生率。一项队列研究比较了两组接受标准化围手术期强化康复方案(ERP)的择期腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的患者:前瞻性组于 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月行 ICA,回顾性组于 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月行 ECA。通过回顾患者的随访 CT 扫描或通过电话访谈或门诊就诊和诊断性影像学检查评估患者是否存在切口疝。次要目标包括住院时间、术后并发症、30 天再入院率、再次手术和死亡率。研究纳入了 89 例因恶性结肠肿瘤行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的患者。其中 48 例行 ECA(ECA 组),41 例行 ICA(ICA 组)。在中位数为 36 个月的随访中,ICA 组有 1 例(2.4%)患者出现切口疝,而 ECA 组有 11 例(22.9%)确诊病例(=0.010)。两组患者的住院时间相似(5 天比 4 天;=0.064)。两组患者术后并发症(=0.093)、住院再入院(=0.999)和 30 天内再次手术率(=0.461)相似。与 ECA 技术相比,ICA 技术与切口疝风险降低相关,且在短期术后并发症和整体患者恢复方面具有相似的结果。