• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对患者诊疗过程的满意度。一份针对特定诊疗过程问卷的信效度。

Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire.

作者信息

Shore B E, Franks P

出版信息

Med Care. 1986 Jul;24(7):580-9.

PMID:3523064
Abstract

While patient satisfaction has been studied extensively and considered an outcome measure of physician-patient encounters, physician satisfaction has received limited consideration. The reliability and validity of an "encounter-specific" physician satisfaction scale were examined. The Delphi technique was used to develop a 39-item questionnaire comprising four hypothesized domains of physician satisfaction: interactive, personal, professional, and contextual. Factor analysis supported two of the four hypothesized categories. Exclusion of all items not contributing to the reliability of the two subscales or differentiating between high and low scores in an item analysis allowed a condensation of the scale. This 16-item scale was tested in a second phase of the study, which supported the reliability and validity of the two-dimension encounter-specific physician satisfaction scale. Further use of the scale may prove useful in exploring this neglected component of physician-patient encounters.

摘要

虽然患者满意度已得到广泛研究,并被视为医患互动的一项结果指标,但医生满意度受到的关注有限。本研究考察了一种“特定互动”医生满意度量表的信效度。采用德尔菲技术开发了一份包含39个条目的问卷,该问卷涵盖医生满意度的四个假设领域:互动、个人、专业和情境。因子分析支持了四个假设类别中的两个。通过在项目分析中排除所有对两个子量表的信度没有贡献或不能区分高分和低分的项目,对量表进行了精简。在研究的第二阶段对这个包含16个条目的量表进行了测试,结果支持了这种二维特定互动医生满意度量表的信效度。该量表的进一步应用可能有助于探索医患互动中这一被忽视的部分。

相似文献

1
Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire.医生对患者诊疗过程的满意度。一份针对特定诊疗过程问卷的信效度。
Med Care. 1986 Jul;24(7):580-9.
2
Patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians, development of a questionnaire.患者对职业健康医生的满意度:一份调查问卷的编制
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):119-23. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.016303.
3
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.用于衡量患者对物理治疗满意度的量表。
Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;82(7):682-91.
6
The impact of detailed explanatory leaflets on patient satisfaction with urodynamic consultation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.详细解释性传单对患者尿动力学检查满意度的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):374-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20667.
7
Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.用于评估医疗保健管理人员对患者与医生之间电子邮件通信使用态度的量表的开发与验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Dec;2(4):512-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.02.005.
8
Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.开发一种心理测量量表以评估斯里兰卡人对牙科护理的满意度。
Community Dent Health. 2009 Sep;26(3):150-6.
9
Cross-cultural differences in the conceptualisation of patients' satisfaction with psychiatric services--content validity of the English version of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale.患者对精神科服务满意度概念化的跨文化差异——维罗纳服务满意度量表英文版的内容效度
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;38(3):142-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0606-7.
10
Measuring attributes of primary care: development of a new instrument.衡量初级保健的属性:一种新工具的开发。
J Fam Pract. 1997 Jul;45(1):64-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Clinician Communication During Cardiology Telemedicine Consultations: A Feasibility Study.心脏病远程医疗会诊中的医患沟通:一项可行性研究
J Patient Exp. 2024 Nov 3;11:23743735241293618. doi: 10.1177/23743735241293618. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical Trial Protocol for a Randomized Trial of Community Health Worker-led Decision Coaching to Promote Shared Decision-making on Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Male Patients and Their Providers.社区卫生工作者主导的决策辅导对促进黑人男性患者及其提供者在前列腺癌筛查方面的共同决策的随机试验临床试验方案。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):909-912. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers.
由社区卫生工作者主导的决策指导促进黑人男性患者及其医疗服务提供者共同参与前列腺癌筛查决策的随机试验。
Trials. 2021 Feb 10;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05064-4.
4
The Working Alliance in Psychiatric Care: Agreement Communication and Trust in Action.精神科护理中的工作联盟:行动中的协议沟通与信任。
Psychiatr Q. 2017 Dec;88(4):711-720. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9492-0.
5
Employment and quality of survivorship among women with cancer: domains not captured by quality of life instruments.癌症女性患者的就业情况与生存质量:生活质量量表未涵盖的领域。
Cancer Control. 2009 Jan;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600109.
6
Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review.评估医生在特定临床诊疗决策过程中认知情况的工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Oct 15;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30.
7
The association of consumer expectations, experiences and satisfaction with newly prescribed medications.消费者对新开具药物的期望、体验与满意度之间的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1127-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9222-4. Epub 2007 May 26.
8
Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views.门诊就医满意度:患者与医生观点的比较
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1088-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30420.x.
9
Determinants of resident satisfaction with patients in their continuity clinic.住院医师对其连续性诊所患者满意度的决定因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 1):456-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30125.x.
10
What do doctors find meaningful about their work?医生们从他们的工作中发现了哪些有意义的事情?
Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):772-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00028.