Chen L, Chiu D T
Microsurgery. 1986;7(2):72-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920070205.
This is an experimental study comparing the suturing time and patency rate of a spiral interrupted suturing technique to those of conventional interrupted and continuous suturing technique in end-to-end as well as end-to-side anastomosis. The spiral interrupted suturing technique requires less time for either end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis than conventional interrupted suturing technique, and does not result in stenosis as shown in the venous end-to-end anastomosis by continuous suturing technique.
这是一项实验研究，比较了螺旋间断缝合技术与传统间断缝合技术及连续缝合技术在端端吻合和端侧吻合中的缝合时间及通畅率。在端端或端侧吻合中，螺旋间断缝合技术所需时间均比传统间断缝合技术少，且不会像连续缝合技术在静脉端端吻合中那样导致狭窄。
