Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware; Center for Health Behavior Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Aug;122(8):1525-1533.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.02.015. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
Food skills are defined as meal planning, preparation, shopping, budgeting, resourcefulness, and label reading/consumer awareness. To date, food skills have not been tested in intervention-based studies.
To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a food skills intervention.
This was an 8-week prospective food skills intervention. Study measures were completed through questionnaires provided before the start of the intervention and after the intervention was completed. For questionnaires, the web platform REDCap was used.
Thirty parents (aged 18 years or older) with at least one child (aged 2 to 12 years), attended weekly virtual intervention sessions via Zoom. The intervention took place from August to October 2020 with assessment measures collected within 2 months of the start and end date of the intervention. Participants were from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States INTERVENTION: A food skills intervention based on behavior modification strategies from the Social Cognitive Theory was implemented. Intervention goals included meal planning (six of seven dinner meals per week), meal plan implementation (at least four of six planned dinner meals), and always using a grocery list when shopping.
Feasibility was evaluated based on parent attendance, number of self-monitoring booklets completed, adherence to goals, implementation fidelity, and qualitative responses to interviews. Change in food skills confidence and nutrition knowledge were also assessed.
Descriptive statistics and qualitative responses were used to describe feasibility. Paired t tests were used to evaluate change in food skills confidence and nutrition knowledge from baseline to 8 weeks.
Parents attended a mean of 7.6 ± 1.0 (out of eight) sessions and completed a mean of 6.2 ± 1.7 (out of seven) self-monitoring booklets. Parents planned a mean of 6.1 ± 1.5 dinners per week and implemented a mean of 4.7 ± 1.6 of the six planned dinners, achieving the intervention goals. Of the mean 1.2 ± 0.6 trips/week to the grocery store reported, grocery lists were used a mean of 1.1 ± 0.6 times. Mean food skills confidence score increased significantly from baseline to 8 weeks (baseline = 86.5 ± 18.0; 8 weeks = 101.4 ± 15.3; P < 0.001). Mean nutrition knowledge score also significantly increased (baseline = 64.1 ± 7.2; 8 weeks = 69.1 ± 6.6; P < 0.001). Parents reported on a scale of zero ("easy") to 10 ("difficult") a mean difficulty rating of 2.4 ± 2.4 for meal planning, a mean of 2.1 ± 2.1 for meal plan implementation, and a mean of 1.0 ± 1.7 for always using a grocery shopping list indicating acceptability of goals.
Feasibility of a food skills intervention was demonstrated by high session attendance, high numbers of self-monitoring booklets turned in, high achievement of intervention goals, parent acceptability, and high ratings of implementation fidelity. There was an increase in food skill confidence and nutrition knowledge. Future research should examine the efficacy of changing food skill behaviors on dietary intake.
食物技能被定义为膳食计划、准备、购物、预算、足智多谋以及阅读标签/消费者意识。迄今为止,食物技能尚未在基于干预的研究中进行测试。
评估实施食物技能干预的可行性。
这是一项为期 8 周的前瞻性食物技能干预研究。研究措施通过在干预开始前和干预完成后提供的问卷完成。对于问卷,使用了 REDCap 网络平台。
30 名父母(年龄在 18 岁或以上),至少有一个孩子(年龄在 2 至 12 岁之间),通过 Zoom 参加每周的虚拟干预课程。干预于 2020 年 8 月至 10 月进行,评估措施在干预开始和结束后 2 个月内收集。参与者来自美国中大西洋地区。
实施了基于社会认知理论的行为改变策略的食物技能干预。干预目标包括膳食计划(每周七顿晚餐中的六顿)、计划实施膳食(六顿计划晚餐中的至少四顿)以及购物时始终使用购物清单。
根据父母的出勤率、完成的自我监测手册数量、对目标的遵守情况、实施的保真度以及对访谈的定性反应来评估可行性。还评估了食物技能信心和营养知识的变化。
使用描述性统计和定性反应来描述可行性。使用配对 t 检验评估食物技能信心和营养知识从基线到 8 周的变化。
父母平均参加了 7.6 ± 1.0(共 8)次课程,并完成了 6.2 ± 1.7(共 7)份自我监测手册。父母平均每周计划 6.1 ± 1.5 顿晚餐,实施了平均 4.7 ± 1.6 顿计划晚餐,达到了干预目标。报告每周平均 1.2 ± 0.6 次去杂货店购物,使用购物清单的次数平均为 1.1 ± 0.6 次。食物技能信心评分从基线到 8 周显著增加(基线=86.5 ± 18.0;8 周=101.4 ± 15.3;P<0.001)。营养知识评分也显著增加(基线=64.1 ± 7.2;8 周=69.1 ± 6.6;P<0.001)。父母在 0(“容易”)到 10(“困难”)的量表上对膳食计划的平均难度评分为 2.4 ± 2.4,对膳食计划实施的平均难度评分为 2.1 ± 2.1,对始终使用购物清单的平均难度评分为 1.0 ± 1.7,表明目标的可接受性。
通过高课程出勤率、大量自我监测手册的完成、干预目标的高实现率、父母的可接受性以及高实施保真度,证明了食物技能干预的可行性。食物技能信心和营养知识有所增加。未来的研究应检验改变食物技能行为对饮食摄入的影响。