Suppr超能文献

“惰性”成分研究不足,对蜜蜂潜在危险,值得更多研究关注。

'Inert' ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention.

机构信息

Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.

Department of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 9;289(1970):20212353. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2353. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Abstract

Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and 'inert' ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients. This reflects the assumption that 'inert' ingredients are non-toxic. A review of relevant research shows that for bees, this assumption is without empirical foundation. After conducting a systematic literature search, we found just 19 studies that tested the effects of 'inert' ingredients on bee health. In these studies, 'inert' ingredients were found to cause mortality in bees through multiple exposure routes, act synergistically with other stressors and cause colony level effects. This lack of research is compounded by a lack of diversity in study organism used. We argue that 'inert' ingredients have distinct, and poorly understood, ecological persistency profiles and toxicities, making research into their individual effects necessary. We highlight the lack of mitigation in place to protect bees from 'inert' ingredients and argue that research efforts should be redistributed to address the knowledge gap identified here. If so-called 'inert' ingredients are, in fact, detrimental to bee health, their potential role in widespread bee declines needs urgent assessment.

摘要

农药制剂由两大类化学物质组成

具有防治病虫害作用的有效成分,以及有助于发挥有效成分作用的“惰性”成分。大多数关于农药影响的研究都集中在有效成分的影响上。这反映了这样一种假设,即“惰性”成分是无毒的。对相关研究的回顾表明,对于蜜蜂来说,这种假设没有经验依据。在进行系统的文献检索后,我们只发现了 19 项测试“惰性”成分对蜜蜂健康影响的研究。在这些研究中,“惰性”成分通过多种暴露途径导致蜜蜂死亡,与其他压力源协同作用,并对蜂群产生影响。这种研究的缺乏因研究中使用的生物体多样性的缺乏而更加严重。我们认为,“惰性”成分具有独特且尚未被充分了解的生态持久性特征和毒性,因此有必要对其单独的影响进行研究。我们强调缺乏缓解措施来保护蜜蜂免受“惰性”成分的侵害,并认为应该重新分配研究工作来解决这里确定的知识差距。如果所谓的“惰性”成分实际上对蜜蜂健康有害,那么它们在蜜蜂广泛减少中的潜在作用需要紧急评估。

相似文献

1
'Inert' ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 9;289(1970):20212353. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2353. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
'Inert' co-formulants of a fungicide mediate acute effects on honey bee learning performance.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46948-6.
3
The formulation makes the honey bee poison.
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2015 May;120:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
5
6
The exposure of honey bees (Apis mellifera; Hymenoptera: Apidae) to pesticides: Room for improvement in research.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jun 1;587-588:423-438. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.062. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access.
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Aug;130(8):85001. doi: 10.1289/EHP10634. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
9
Interaction patterns and combined toxic effects of acetamiprid in combination with seven pesticides on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.).
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Mar 1;190:110100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110100. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of a fungicide and an insecticide on pollinator visitation and wildflower fitness.
Funct Ecol. 2025 Jul;39(7):1815-1825. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.70053. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Bumblebees avoid sucrose solution containing high concentrations of Roundup.
Ecotoxicology. 2025 Jul;34(5):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s10646-025-02878-9. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Invited Perspective: The Far Reach of PFAS-Inert Ingredients and Adjuvants in Pesticide Formulations.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Jul;132(7):71304. doi: 10.1289/EHP15445. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Breaking the cycle: Reforming pesticide regulation to protect pollinators.
Bioscience. 2023 Oct 23;73(11):808-813. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biad088. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Review: the risks of spray adjuvants to honey bees.
J Insect Sci. 2023 Nov 1;23(6). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead100.
7
'Inert' co-formulants of a fungicide mediate acute effects on honey bee learning performance.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46948-6.
10
Weak evidence base for bee protective pesticide mitigation measures.
J Econ Entomol. 2023 Oct 10;116(5):1604-1612. doi: 10.1093/jee/toad118.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
4
Improving pesticide-use data for the EU.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec;5(12):1560. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01574-1.
5
Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality.
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7872):389-392. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Sulfoxaflor and nutritional deficiency synergistically reduce survival and fecundity in bumblebees.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148680. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148680. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1582-1589. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Beyond neonicotinoids - Wild pollinators are exposed to a range of pesticides while foraging in agroecosystems.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 10;742:140436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140436. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
The need for an evolutionary approach to ecotoxicology.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jul;4(7):895. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1194-6.
10
Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 10;14(12):e0225743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225743. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验