Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 810 Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 810 Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):1979-1986. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.034. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
Results from single-region studies suggest that stay at home orders (SAHOs) had unforeseen consequences on the volume and patterns of traumatic injury during the initial months of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe, using a multi-regional approach, the effects of COVID-19 SAHOs on trauma volume and patterns of traumatic injury in the US.
A retrospective cohort study was performed at four verified Level I trauma centers spanning three geographical regions across the United States (US). The study period spanned from April 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 including a month-matched 2019 cohort. Patients were categorized into pre-COVID-19 (PCOV19) and first COVID-19 surge (FCOV19S) cohorts. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected via Trauma Registry queries. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
A total 5,616 patients presented to participating study centers during the PCOV19 (2,916) and FCOV19S (2,700) study periods. Blunt injury volume decreased (p = 0.006) due to a significant reduction in the number of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) (p = 0.003). Penetrating trauma experienced a significant increase, 8% (246/2916) in 2019 to 11% (285/2,700) in 2020 (p = 0.007), which was associated with study site (p = 0.002), not SAHOs. Finally, study site was significantly associated with changes in nearly all injury mechanisms, whereas SAHOs accounted for observed decreases in calculated weekly averages of blunt injuries (p < 0.02) and MVCs (p = 0.003).
Results of this study suggest that COVID-19 and initial SAHOs had variable consequences on patterns of traumatic injury, and that region-specific shifts in traumatic injury ensued during initial SAHOs. These results suggest that other factors, potentially socioeconomic or cultural, confound trauma volumes and types arising from SAHOs. Future analyses must consider how regional changes may be obscured with pooled cohorts, and focus on characterizing community-level changes to aid municipal preparation for future similar events.
来自单区域研究的结果表明,在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)最初几个月,居家令(Stay-at-home orders,SAHOs)对创伤量和创伤模式产生了意想不到的后果。本研究的目的是使用多区域方法描述 COVID-19 居家令对美国创伤量和创伤模式的影响。
在四家经核实的一级创伤中心进行回顾性队列研究,这些中心分布在美国三个地理区域。研究期间为 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日,包括一个与 2019 年相匹配的月份队列。患者分为 COVID-19 前(PCOV19)和首次 COVID-19 激增(FCOV19S)队列。通过创伤登记查询收集患者人口统计学、损伤和结局数据。进行了单变量和多变量分析。
在 PCOV19(2916 例)和 FCOV19S(2700 例)研究期间,共有 5616 例患者到参与研究的中心就诊。由于机动车碰撞(MVC)数量显著减少(p=0.006),钝性损伤量减少。穿透性损伤显著增加,2019 年为 8%(246/2916),2020 年为 11%(285/2700)(p=0.007),这与研究地点有关(p=0.002),而与居家令无关。最后,研究地点与几乎所有损伤机制的变化显著相关,而居家令则导致计算出的每周钝性损伤和 MVC 平均值的观察性下降(p<0.02)。
本研究结果表明,COVID-19 和最初的居家令对创伤模式产生了不同的影响,并且在最初的居家令期间,创伤类型发生了区域性变化。这些结果表明,其他因素,如社会经济或文化因素,可能会影响居家令引起的创伤量和类型。未来的分析必须考虑如何在汇总队列中掩盖区域变化,并侧重于描述社区层面的变化,以帮助市政当局为未来类似事件做好准备。