Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Children's Wisconsin and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
J Surg Res. 2023 Sep;289:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Reports of pediatric injury patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic are conflicting and lack the granularity to explore differences across regions. We hypothesized there would be considerable variation in injury patterns across pediatric trauma centers in the United States.
A multicenter, retrospective study evaluating patients <18 y old with traumatic injuries meeting National Trauma Data Bank criteria was performed. Patients injured after stay-at-home orders through September 2020 ("COVID" cohort) were compared to "Historical" controls from an averaged period of equivalent dates in 2016-2019. Differences in injury type, intent, and mechanism were explored at the site level.
47,385 pediatric trauma patients were included. Overall trauma volume increased during the COVID cohort compared to the Historical (COVID 7068 patients versus Historical 5891 patients); however, some sites demonstrated a decrease in overall trauma of 25% while others had an increase of over 33%. Bicycle injuries increased at every site, with a range in percent change from 24% to 135% increase. Although the greatest net increase was due to blunt injuries, there was a greater relative increase in penetrating injuries at 7/9 sites, with a range in percent change from a 110% increase to a 69% decrease.
There was considerable discrepancy in pediatric injury patterns at the individual site level, perhaps suggesting a variable impact of the specific sociopolitical climate and pandemic policies of each catchment area. Investigation of the unique response of the community during times of stress at pediatric trauma centers is warranted to be better prepared for future environmental stressors.
有关 COVID-19 大流行期间儿科伤害模式的报告相互矛盾,缺乏探索区域差异的细微差别。我们假设美国儿科创伤中心之间的伤害模式会有很大差异。
进行了一项多中心、回顾性研究,评估了符合国家创伤数据库标准的 18 岁以下有创伤性损伤的患者。将居家令发布后至 2020 年 9 月期间的“COVID”队列患者与 2016-2019 年同期平均时期的“历史”对照进行比较。在部位水平上探讨了损伤类型、意图和机制的差异。
共纳入 47385 例儿科创伤患者。与历史对照组(COVID 队列 7068 例,历史对照组 5891 例)相比,COVID 队列的总体创伤量增加;然而,一些部位的总体创伤量减少了 25%,而其他部位则增加了 33%以上。每个部位的自行车损伤都增加了,百分比变化范围为 24%至 135%。虽然钝性损伤的净增幅度最大,但在 7/9 个部位,穿透性损伤的相对增加幅度更大,百分比变化范围从增加 110%到减少 69%。
在个别部位的儿科伤害模式上存在相当大的差异,这可能表明每个集水区特定的社会政治气候和大流行政策的影响存在差异。需要对社区在儿科创伤中心面临压力时的独特反应进行调查,以便为未来的环境压力做好更好的准备。