RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):e220099. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0099. Epub 2022 May 11.
The time involved in performing a procedure is a key factor in determining physician payments by Medicare. However, there are long-standing concerns regarding the accuracy of the time estimates generated by the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee surveys that are used in the valuation process, and there have been calls to use other data sources to estimate procedure times.
To compare estimated procedure times that come from claims with the times used in Medicare's valuation process.
Building off prior work using Medicare fee-for-service claims, procedure times were estimated from linked anesthesia claims data for 1349 different Current Procedure Terminology codes that are typically performed with anesthesia. All procedures in the nation performed in 2018 for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were included in the analysis. These estimated times were compared with the times used in the valuation process. Analysis took place from February to November 2021.
Estimated procedure times using anesthesia claims were compared with the procedure time used in valuation by calculating an estimated-to-valuation procedure time ratio for each code. The valuation procedure time is publicly reported by Medicare. The mean and median ratio are presented over all procedures and for select high-volume codes as well as by patient characteristics (age, sex, and risk score) and specialty of the physician performing the procedure.
Across 4.9 million procedures in this analysis, the mean estimated procedure time was 27% lower than the time used in the valuation process. There were notable exceptions, for which the mean estimated procedure time equaled or exceeded the valuation time including total hip arthroplasty (5% longer) and total knee arthroplasty (equal duration). Within a given code, older patients and those with more illness had longer procedure times. There was substantial variation across specialties in the percent difference between mean estimated and valuation procedure times ranging from gastroenterology (36% shorter) and ophthalmology (35% shorter) to cardiac surgery (2% longer) and thoracic surgery (7% longer).
Claims-based procedure times could be used to improve the accuracy of valuations for procedures.
在确定医疗保险支付给医生的费用时,手术所花费的时间是一个关键因素。然而,人们长期以来一直担心美国医学协会/专业协会相对价值更新委员会调查所产生的时间估计值在评估过程中的准确性,并且有人呼吁使用其他数据源来估计手术时间。
比较来自索赔的估计手术时间与医疗保险估值过程中使用的时间。
基于先前使用医疗保险按服务收费索赔的工作,从 1349 个不同的当前程序术语代码的麻醉索赔数据中估算了手术时间,这些代码通常在麻醉下进行。该分析包括 2018 年全国所有为医疗保险按服务收费受益人的手术。将这些估计的时间与估值过程中使用的时间进行比较。分析于 2021 年 2 月至 11 月进行。
使用麻醉索赔估算的手术时间与估值中的手术时间进行比较,通过计算每个代码的估计与估值手术时间比来计算。估值手术时间由医疗保险公开报告。平均值和中位数比率在所有手术中以及一些高容量代码以及手术医生的患者特征(年龄、性别和风险评分)和专业中呈现。
在本次分析的 490 万例手术中,估计的手术时间平均比估值过程中使用的时间低 27%。有一些明显的例外,其中包括全髋关节置换术(长 5%)和全膝关节置换术(持续时间相等),平均估计手术时间等于或超过估值时间。在给定的代码中,年龄较大的患者和病情较重的患者手术时间较长。在平均估计和估值手术时间之间的差异百分比方面,不同专业之间存在很大差异,范围从胃肠病学(短 36%)和眼科(短 35%)到心脏手术(长 2%)和胸外科(长 7%)。
基于索赔的手术时间可用于提高手术估值的准确性。