Department of Pharmacy Practice, Marshall B. Ketchum University College of Pharmacy, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Department of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Claremont, CA, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 May 24;79(11):860-872. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac070.
Although pharmacist-provided diabetes services have been shown to be effective, the effectiveness of telepharmacy (TP) in diabetes management has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of diabetes TP services.
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched (from inception through September 2021) to identify published studies that evaluated the effect of TP services in patients with diabetes mellitus and reported either glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting blood glucose (FBG) outcomes. Mean difference (MD), weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.
36 studies involving 13,773 patients were included in the systematic review, and 23 studies were included in the meta-analysis. TP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c (MD, -1.26%; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.84) from baseline. FBG was not significantly affected (MD, -25.32 mg/dL; 95% CI, -57.62 to 6.98). Compared to non-TP service, TP was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76). In a subset of studies that compared TP to face-to-face (FTF) pharmacy services, no significant difference in HbA1c lowering was seen between the 2 groups (WMD, -0.09%; 95% CI, -1.07 to 0.90).
Use of TP was associated with reduction of HbA1c and the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the effectiveness of diabetes TP services relative to FTF services.
虽然已证实药剂师提供的糖尿病服务具有疗效,但远程药学服务(TP)在糖尿病管理中的疗效尚未明确。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估糖尿病 TP 服务的有效性。
检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(从创建到 2021 年 9 月),以确定评估糖尿病患者 TP 服务效果并报告糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)或空腹血糖(FBG)结果的已发表研究。采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应模型计算均数差(MD)、加权均数差(WMD)、相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间。
纳入了 36 项涉及 13773 名患者的系统评价研究,其中 23 项研究纳入了荟萃分析。TP 与基线时 HbA1c 显著降低相关(MD,-1.26%;95%CI,-1.69 至-0.84)。FBG 未受显著影响(MD,-25.32mg/dL;95%CI,-57.62 至 6.98)。与非 TP 服务相比,TP 与低血糖风险降低相关(RR,0.48;95%CI,0.30-0.76)。在一项比较 TP 与面对面(FTF)药学服务的研究子集中,两组之间在降低 HbA1c 方面未观察到显著差异(WMD,-0.09%;95%CI,-1.07 至 0.90)。
在糖尿病患者中,使用 TP 与 HbA1c 降低和低血糖风险降低相关。需要高质量的随机对照试验来验证糖尿病 TP 服务相对于 FTF 服务的有效性。