• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性腹膜癌和卵巢癌——十年对比分析。

Primary peritoneal carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma - a ten-year comparative analysis.

出版信息

Klin Onkol. 2022 Winter;35(1):63-71. doi: 10.48095/ccko202263.

DOI:10.48095/ccko202263
PMID:35236083
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) at presentation often masquerades as epithelial ovarian carcinoma (OC) but behaves different with respect to treatment response, recurrence patterns and has inferior outcomes. The objective of this study is to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of PPC and OC.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained database of patients presenting to the gynecologic oncology department at a tertiary hospital was reviewed between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020. A comparative analysis of high-grade serous stage III/IV PPC and OC was done. Demographics, treatment details, complications and survival outcomes were collected from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

151 OC and 69 PPC patients were included. A higher proportion of women with PPC had reduced performance status prior to hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy, a shorter symptom to treatment interval, and large volume ascites. A significantly lower number of women with PPC (4.3 vs. 46.1%; P < 0.001) underwent primary cytoreduction, had a lower median surgical complexity score (3 vs. 4; P < 0.001) but higher recurrence rates (66.7 vs. 47.0%; P = 0.041) as compared to the patients with OC. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 (15-20) months in PPC and 23 (17-28) months in OC patients (log-rank P = 0.034), while the median overall survival (OS) was similar (44 vs. 48 months; log-rank P = 0.696). The presence of extraperitoneal disease and interval cytoreduction was associated with shorter PFS. Suboptimal cytoreduction and delay in adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 6 weeks post-surgery was associated with reduced OS.

CONCLUSION

PPC is an aggressive disease with lower PFS compared to OC. Commonly presenting with large volume carcinomatosis, it is not amenable for primary cytoreduction, making the usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy a common practice and pragmatic approach.

摘要

背景

原发性腹膜癌(PPC)在发病时常常表现为上皮性卵巢癌(OC),但其治疗反应、复发模式有所不同,预后较差。本研究旨在比较 PPC 和 OC 的临床病理特征和生存结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在一家三级医院妇科肿瘤科就诊的患者的前瞻性维护数据库。对高级别浆液性 III/IV 期 PPC 和 OC 进行了对比分析。从电子病历中收集人口统计学、治疗细节、并发症和生存结局等数据。

结果

共纳入 151 例 OC 和 69 例 PPC 患者。与 OC 患者相比,更多的 PPC 患者在子宫切除和双侧附件切除术前体力状况较差,症状至治疗的间隔时间较短,腹水较多。接受初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的 PPC 患者比例明显较低(4.3%比 46.1%;P < 0.001),手术复杂度评分中位数较低(3 分比 4 分;P < 0.001),但复发率较高(66.7%比 47.0%;P = 0.041)。PPC 患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 18(15-20)个月,OC 患者为 23(17-28)个月(对数秩检验 P = 0.034),中位总生存期(OS)相似(44 比 48 个月;对数秩检验 P = 0.696)。腹膜外疾病的存在和间隔时间内的肿瘤细胞减灭术与较短的 PFS 相关。辅助化疗不充分和术后 6 周后延迟开始与 OS 降低相关。

结论

PPC 是一种侵袭性疾病,与 OC 相比 PFS 较短。由于常表现为大量癌性腹水,其不适合初次肿瘤细胞减灭术,因此常采用新辅助化疗,这是一种常见的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Primary peritoneal carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma - a ten-year comparative analysis.原发性腹膜癌和卵巢癌——十年对比分析。
Klin Onkol. 2022 Winter;35(1):63-71. doi: 10.48095/ccko202263.
2
Survival outcomes after delayed cytoreduction surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗后延迟细胞减灭术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1935-1942. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001658. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.将机器人手术纳入新辅助化疗后卵巢癌的治疗管理中。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1341-1347. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000413. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
4
When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.当少即是多时:新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌间隔减瘤术的微创与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.765. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Study of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, SGOG SUNNY (SOC-2) trial concept.前瞻性手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术治疗 IIIC 期和 IV 期卵巢癌患者的研究,SGOG SUNNY(SOC-2)试验方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e86. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e86.
6
Potential risk factors associated with prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients.Ⅲc-IV期高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术预后的潜在风险因素
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Sep;44(9):1808-1816. doi: 10.1111/jog.13710. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
7
Minimal residual disease at primary debulking surgery versus complete tumor resection at interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A survival analysis.在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时的微小残留病灶与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术时的完全肿瘤切除相比:一项生存分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
8
Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.辅助化疗对初次细胞减灭术后晚期低级别浆液性卵巢癌患者总生存期的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Dec 4;33(12):1906-1912. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004745.
9
Outcomes Following Interval Debulking Surgery in Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma.原发性腹膜癌间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术后的结局
Anticancer Res. 2016 Jan;36(1):255-9.
10
Survival outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a tertiary-level hospital in India.印度一家三级医院治疗上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局。