Suppr超能文献

探讨国家教育组织如何在成员中促进教育研究:一项基于调查的研究。

Exploring how national educational organizations can promote educational research amongst members: a survey-based study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 2516 Stockton Blvd, 95817, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Office of Medical Education, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 108 Taylor Hall, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03202-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engagement of academic faculty in research remains low. While barriers to research have been explored, there are no data on how national organizations can help overcome these barriers. Our study explored faculty satisfaction and motivational drivers for engagement with research opportunities offered by the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP), an organization of pediatric medical educators, and characterize strategies perceived by faculty to promote the use of these opportunities.

METHODS

In 2021, 5 survey questions were administered to faculty members of COMSEP to explore satisfaction with COMSEP's research offerings, the perceived value of educational research, and the facilitators, barriers and potential opportunities for COMSEP to promote research. Clark's Commitment and Necessary Effort model on motivation served as the theoretical framework for our study, which explores motivation, self-efficacy and contextual factors influencing an individual's pursuit of goals. Chi-square analysis and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test were used to compare categorical and scaled variables among groups who did and did not avail of COMSEP's research offerings.

RESULTS

90 (25%) of 360 recipients responded. 61% expressed satisfaction with COMSEP's research offerings. 68% indicated research was an expectation of their academic appointment, that education was their primary research focus (74%) and that they did not have other research opportunities that met their needs (58%). Of respondents, 75.7% of females had submitted a proposal compared to 60% of non-responders who were females. The comparison by gender was not statistically significant. Exploration by academic rank revealed that 35% of instructor/assistant professors had submitted a proposal compared to 65% of associate professors/professors (p =.05). Barriers leading to non-submission to any of the offerings included having too much other work, lack of enjoyment in writing and inability to find mentors. Respondents endorsed the importance of several strategies to promote engagement in research-skill building opportunities, personalized consultations and increased funding.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty educators value the importance of educational research and recognize that research opportunities offered by COMSEP address an unmet need, but express ambivalence in the enjoyment of writing (reflecting their mood), and endorse structural barriers, that are amenable to change, affecting their personal agency.

摘要

背景

学术教师参与研究的积极性仍然较低。虽然已经探讨了研究的障碍,但关于国家组织如何帮助克服这些障碍的数据尚不存在。我们的研究探讨了教师对儿科学教育研究理事会 (COMSEP) 提供的研究机会的满意度和激励因素,COMSEP 是一个儿科医学教育者组织,并描述了教师认为可以促进利用这些机会的策略。

方法

2021 年,向 COMSEP 的教师成员发送了 5 个调查问题,以探讨他们对 COMSEP 研究成果的满意度、对教育研究的感知价值,以及 COMSEP 促进研究的促进因素、障碍和潜在机会。克拉克的动机承诺和必要努力模型为我们的研究提供了理论框架,该研究探讨了影响个人追求目标的动机、自我效能感和情境因素。卡方分析和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验用于比较使用和未使用 COMSEP 研究成果的组之间的分类和量表变量。

结果

360 名收件人中,有 90 人(25%)做出了回应。61%的人对 COMSEP 的研究成果表示满意。68%的人表示研究是他们学术任命的期望,他们的主要研究重点是教育(74%),并且他们没有其他满足其需求的研究机会(58%)。在回应者中,75.7%的女性提交了提案,而女性非回应者的这一比例为 60%。按性别进行的比较没有统计学意义。按学术职称进行的探索显示,35%的讲师/助理教授提交了提案,而副教授/教授的这一比例为 65%(p=.05)。导致未提交任何提案的障碍包括工作太多、写作不感兴趣和无法找到导师。回应者认为,开展研究技能培养机会、个性化咨询和增加资金等几种策略对于促进参与非常重要。

结论

教师教育者重视教育研究的重要性,并认识到 COMSEP 提供的研究机会满足了未满足的需求,但在写作的享受方面(反映他们的情绪)表现出矛盾,并支持影响个人能动性的可改变的结构障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f92/8889650/8ca677035c09/12909_2022_3202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验