Wesson William, Galate Vincent L, Sborov Douglas W, McClune Brian, Goodman Aaron M, Gyawali Bishal, Prasad Vinay, Abbasi Saqib, Mohyuddin Ghulam Rehman
School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Division of Hematology, Huntsman Cancer Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2022 May;167:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.037. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
As the landscape of haematological malignancies dramatically changes due to diagnostic and therapeutic advances, it is important to evaluate trends in clinical trial designs. The objective of our study was to describe the design of clinical trials for five common haematological malignancies with respect to randomisation and end-points. We also aimed to assess trends over time and examine the relationships of funding source and country of origin to proportions of randomisation and utilisation of clinical end-points.
This systematic review identified haematological malignancy clinical trials starting in 2015-2020 registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as of 20th February 2021. Trial-related variables including randomisation status, type of primary end-point, and both projected and actual enrolment numbers were captured. Clinical end-points were defined as overall survival and quality of life, while surrogate end-points included all other end-points.
Of 2609 relevant trials included in this analysis, only one-fifth were randomised (538, 21%), with a significant decrease in the proportion of randomised clinical trials from 26% of trials in 2015 to 19% in 2020 (p < 0.00001). Between the years 2015 and 2020, the proportion of randomised trials for all haematological malignancies using primary surrogate end-points remained relatively consistent, ranging from 84% in 2015 to 78% in 2020 (p = 0.352). Overall, only 15% of trials utilised primary end-points of overall survival or quality of life in a randomised design.
This systematic review of haematological malignancy trials found that the majority of trials are non-randomised and that there has been an increase in the ratio of non-randomised to randomised studies over time. The vast majority of randomised haematological malignancy trials use surrogate primary end-points.
由于诊断和治疗方面的进展,血液系统恶性肿瘤的格局发生了巨大变化,评估临床试验设计的趋势非常重要。我们研究的目的是描述五种常见血液系统恶性肿瘤临床试验在随机分组和终点方面的设计情况。我们还旨在评估随时间的趋势,并研究资金来源和原产国与随机分组比例及临床终点使用情况之间的关系。
本系统评价确定了截至2021年2月20日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的2015 - 2020年开始的血液系统恶性肿瘤临床试验。记录了与试验相关的变量,包括随机分组状态、主要终点类型以及预计和实际入组人数。临床终点定义为总生存期和生活质量,而替代终点包括所有其他终点。
在本次分析纳入的2609项相关试验中,只有五分之一是随机分组的(538项,21%),随机临床试验的比例从2015年试验的26%显著下降至2020年的19%(p < 0.00001)。在2015年至2020年期间,所有使用主要替代终点的血液系统恶性肿瘤随机试验的比例相对保持一致,从2015年的84%到2020年的78%(p = 0.352)。总体而言,只有15%的试验在随机设计中使用总生存期或生活质量作为主要终点。
这项对血液系统恶性肿瘤试验的系统评价发现,大多数试验是非随机的,并且随着时间的推移,非随机研究与随机研究的比例有所增加。绝大多数随机血液系统恶性肿瘤试验使用替代主要终点。