Parr Ashley C, Calancie Olivia G, Coe Brian C, Khalid-Khan Sarosh, Munoz Douglas P
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 14;15:667399. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.667399. eCollection 2021.
Impulsivity and emotional dysregulation are two core features of borderline personality disorder (BPD), and the neural mechanisms recruited during mixed-strategy interactions overlap with frontolimbic networks that have been implicated in BPD. We investigated strategic choice patterns during the classic two-player game, Matching Pennies, where the most efficient strategy is to choose each option randomly from trial-to-trial to avoid exploitation by one's opponent. Twenty-seven female adolescents with BPD (mean age: 16 years) and twenty-seven age-matched female controls (mean age: 16 years) participated in an experiment that explored the relationship between strategic choice behavior and impulsivity in both groups and emotional dysregulation in BPD. Relative to controls, BPD participants showed marginally fewer reinforcement learning biases, particularly decreased lose-shift biases, increased variability in reaction times (coefficient of variation; CV), and a greater percentage of anticipatory decisions. A subset of BPD participants with high levels of impulsivity showed higher overall reward rates, and greater modulation of reaction times by outcome, particularly following loss trials, relative to control and BPD participants with lower levels of impulsivity. Additionally, BPD participants with higher levels of emotional dysregulation showed marginally increased reward rate and increased entropy in choice patterns. Together, our preliminary results suggest that impulsivity and emotional dysregulation may contribute to variability in mixed-strategy decision-making in female adolescents with BPD.
冲动性和情绪失调是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的两个核心特征,在混合策略互动过程中所动用的神经机制与边缘型人格障碍中涉及的前额叶边缘网络重叠。我们在经典的两人游戏“猜硬币”中研究了策略选择模式,在这个游戏中,最有效的策略是在每次试验中随机选择每个选项,以避免被对手利用。27名患有边缘型人格障碍的女性青少年(平均年龄:16岁)和27名年龄匹配的女性对照组(平均年龄:16岁)参与了一项实验,该实验探究了两组的策略选择行为与冲动性以及边缘型人格障碍中的情绪失调之间的关系。相对于对照组,边缘型人格障碍参与者表现出略少的强化学习偏差,尤其是减少的损失转移偏差、反应时间变异性增加(变异系数;CV)以及更高比例的预期决策。与低冲动水平的对照组和边缘型人格障碍参与者相比,一部分高冲动水平的边缘型人格障碍参与者表现出更高的总体奖励率,以及结果对反应时间的更大调节作用,尤其是在损失试验之后。此外,情绪失调水平较高的边缘型人格障碍参与者表现出奖励率略有增加,以及选择模式中的熵增加。总之,我们的初步结果表明,冲动性和情绪失调可能导致患有边缘型人格障碍的女性青少年在混合策略决策中出现变异性。