Seaman Robert W, Lordson Chris, Collins Gregory T
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 14;13:814574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814574. eCollection 2022.
Concurrent use of stimulants (e.g., methamphetamine) and opioids (e.g., fentanyl) has become increasingly common in recent years and continues to pose an enormous health burden, worldwide. Despite the prevalence, relatively little is known about interactions between the reinforcing effects of stimulants and opioids in this pattern of polysubstance use. The goals of the current study were to evaluate the relative reinforcing and relapse-related effects of methamphetamine and fentanyl using a concurrent access, drug-vs.-drug choice procedure. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were first allowed to acquire self-administration for either 0.1 mg/kg/infusion methamphetamine or 0.0032 mg/kg/infusion fentanyl, independently, after which concurrent access to both drugs was provided. When training doses of methamphetamine and fentanyl were concurrently available, a subset of rats self-administered both drugs, either within a session or alternating across sessions, whereas the remaining rats responded exclusively for one drug. When the cost of the preferred drug was increased (i.e., unit dose reduced), or the cost of the non-preferred drug was decreased (i.e., unit dose increased), choice was largely allocated toward the cheaper alternative. Following extinction of responding, methamphetamine- and fentanyl-paired cues reinstated responding on both levers. Responding reinstated by a priming injection of methamphetamine or fentanyl allocated more responding to the lever previously reinforced by the priming drug. The current studies suggest that choice of methamphetamine and fentanyl is largely allocated to the cheaper alternative, although more co-use was observed than would be expected for economic substitutes. Moreover, they lay the groundwork for more fully evaluating interactions between commonly co-abused drugs (e.g., stimulants and opioids) in order to better understand the determinants of polysubstance use and develop effective treatment strategies for individuals suffering from a polysubstance use disorder.
近年来,兴奋剂(如甲基苯丙胺)和阿片类药物(如芬太尼)的同时使用变得越来越普遍,并且在全球范围内继续构成巨大的健康负担。尽管这种情况很普遍,但对于这种多物质使用模式中兴奋剂和阿片类药物强化作用之间的相互作用,人们了解得相对较少。本研究的目的是使用同时给药、药物对比选择程序来评估甲基苯丙胺和芬太尼的相对强化作用及与复发相关的作用。首先让雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠分别学会自我给药0.1毫克/千克/次的甲基苯丙胺或0.0032毫克/千克/次的芬太尼,之后让它们同时获得这两种药物。当甲基苯丙胺和芬太尼的训练剂量同时可用时,一部分大鼠在一次实验中或在不同实验中交替自我给药这两种药物,而其余大鼠只对一种药物有反应。当首选药物的成本增加(即单位剂量减少),或非首选药物的成本降低(即单位剂量增加)时,选择主要转向更便宜的替代药物。在反应消退后,与甲基苯丙胺和芬太尼配对的线索恢复了两个杠杆上的反应。由甲基苯丙胺或芬太尼的启动注射恢复的反应,更多地分配到了先前由启动药物强化的杠杆上。当前的研究表明,甲基苯丙胺和芬太尼的选择主要转向更便宜的替代药物,尽管观察到的共同使用情况比经济替代品预期的要多。此外,这些研究为更全面地评估常见共同滥用药物(如兴奋剂和阿片类药物)之间的相互作用奠定了基础,以便更好地理解多物质使用的决定因素,并为患有多物质使用障碍的个体制定有效的治疗策略。