Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比化疗单药作为一线治疗方案用于非小细胞肺癌老年患者(≥75 岁)。

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Monotherapy as a First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients (≥75 Years Old) With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 14;13:807575. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.807575. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several trials have shown that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was more effective in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than chemotherapy monotherapy. However, whether pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is still a better choice for first-line treatment in elderly patients (≥75 years old) remain unknown. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected data of 136 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy monotherapy in our hospital from 2018 to 2020. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients and analyzed which subgroups might benefit more significantly from pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In total population, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy showed superior PFS and OS than chemotherapy monotherapy (PFS: 12.50 months vs. 5.30 months, P<0.001; OS: unreached vs. 21.27 months, P=0.037). Subgroup analysis showed patients with positive PD-L1 expression, stage IV, good performance score (ECOG-PS <2), fewer comorbidities (simplified comorbidity score <9) or female patients had demonstrated a more evident OS benefit in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. In terms of safety, the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group had higher treatment discontinuation (26% vs. 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients using pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy achieved longer PFS and OS, but were more likely to discontinue due to adverse effects, so disease stage, PD-L1 expression, ECOG-PS and comorbidities should be considered when selecting first-line treatment.

摘要

目的

多项试验表明,与化疗单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效更为显著。然而,对于≥75 岁的老年患者,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗是否仍然是一线治疗的更好选择尚不清楚。我们回顾性比较了这两种治疗方法在老年患者中的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

我们收集了 2018 年至 2020 年期间在我院接受帕博利珠单抗联合化疗或化疗单药治疗的 136 例晚期 NSCLC 老年患者的数据。我们比较了患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并分析了哪些亚组可能从帕博利珠单抗联合化疗中获益更显著。

结果

在全人群中,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗组的 PFS 和 OS 均优于化疗单药组(PFS:12.50 个月 vs. 5.30 个月,P<0.001;OS:未达到 vs. 21.27 个月,P=0.037)。亚组分析显示,PD-L1 表达阳性、IV 期、较好的体能状态评分(ECOG-PS<2)、较少合并症(简化合并症评分<9)或女性患者在帕博利珠单抗联合化疗中具有更显著的 OS 获益。在安全性方面,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗组的治疗中断率更高(26% vs. 5%)。

结论

老年患者使用帕博利珠单抗联合化疗可获得更长的 PFS 和 OS,但因不良反应而更有可能停药,因此在选择一线治疗时应考虑疾病分期、PD-L1 表达、ECOG-PS 和合并症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30be/8882651/6e482091f82a/fimmu-13-807575-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验