Larson Daniel, Vu Vien, Ness Brandon M, Wellsandt Elizabeth, Morrison Scot
Lawrence Memorial Hospital/OrthoKansas.
Samaritan Athletic Medicine; Oregon State University Athletics Department.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Dec 1;17(1):27-46. doi: 10.26603/001c.29456. eCollection 2022.
Several negative adaptations to the musculoskeletal system occur following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) such as arthrogenic muscle inhibition, decreased lower extremity muscle size, strength, power, as well as alterations to bone and cartilage. These changes have been associated with worse functional outcomes, altered biomechanics, and increased risk for re-injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. After ACL injury and subsequent ACLR, examination and evaluation of the musculoskeletal system is paramount to guiding clinical decision making during the rehabilitation and the return to sport process. The lack of access many clinicians have to devices necessary for gold standard assessment of muscle capacities and force profiles is often perceived as a significant barrier to best practices. Fortunately, testing for deficits can be accomplished with methods available to the clinician without access to costly equipment or time-intensive procedures. Interventions to address musculoskeletal system deficits can be implemented with a periodized program. This allows for restoration of physical capacities by adequately developing and emphasizing physical qualities beginning with mobility and movement, and progressing to work capacity and neuromuscular re-education, strength, explosive strength, and elastic or reactive strength. Additional considerations to aid in addressing strength deficits will be discussed such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation, volume and intensity, eccentric training, training to failure, cross-education, and biomechanical considerations. The American Physical Therapy Association adopted a new vision statement in 2013 which supported further development of the profession's identity by promoting the movement system, yet validation of the movement system has remained a challenge. Application of a multi-physiologic systems approach may offer a unique understanding of the musculoskeletal system and its integration with other body systems after ACLR. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to highlight important musculoskeletal system considerations within a multi-physiologic system approach to human movement following ACLR.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和ACL重建(ACLR)后,肌肉骨骼系统会出现多种负面适应性变化,如关节源性肌肉抑制、下肢肌肉尺寸减小、力量和功率下降,以及骨骼和软骨改变。这些变化与更差的功能结果、生物力学改变以及再次受伤和创伤后骨关节炎风险增加有关。ACL损伤及随后的ACLR后,对肌肉骨骼系统进行检查和评估对于指导康复及重返运动过程中的临床决策至关重要。许多临床医生无法获得用于肌肉能力和力轮廓金标准评估的设备,这通常被视为最佳实践的重大障碍。幸运的是,临床医生可通过现有方法检测缺陷,而无需使用昂贵设备或耗时程序。可通过分期计划实施解决肌肉骨骼系统缺陷的干预措施。这通过从灵活性和运动开始,充分发展和强调身体素质,逐步恢复身体能力,进而提高工作能力和进行神经肌肉再教育、力量、爆发力以及弹性或反应性力量训练。还将讨论有助于解决力量缺陷的其他考虑因素,如神经肌肉电刺激、训练量和强度、离心训练、训练至疲劳、交叉训练以及生物力学考虑因素。美国物理治疗协会在2013年通过了一项新的愿景声明,支持通过促进运动系统进一步发展该专业的身份认同,但运动系统的验证仍然是一个挑战。应用多生理系统方法可能会为ACLR后肌肉骨骼系统及其与身体其他系统的整合提供独特的理解。本临床评论的目的是强调在多生理系统方法中对ACLR后人体运动进行评估时,肌肉骨骼系统的重要考虑因素。
5级。