Suppr超能文献

前置胎盘孕妇剖宫产术中球囊压迫的作用:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Role of balloon tamponade during cesarean section in women with placenta previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cerra Chiara, DI Girolamo Raffaella, Khalil Asma, Sileo Filomena G, Alameddine Sara, Greco Pantaleo, Liberati Marco, Cali Giuseppe, D'Antonio Francesco

机构信息

Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University, London, UK.

出版信息

Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;74(5):444-451. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05055-2. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To explore the role of balloon tamponade insertion in pregnancies complicated by placenta previa.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Medline, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched electronically on October 17. Inclusion criteria were women with placenta previa undergoing, compared to those not undergoing, balloon tamponade insertion at the time of the cesarean section (CS). The outcomes observed were total, intra- and post-operative estimated blood loss (EBL), need for blood transfusion, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), hysterectomy and additional surgical or medical procedures to achieve hemostasis. Results were reported as pooled odd ratios (OR) or mean difference (MD) according to the outcome investigated.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Four studies (593 women) were included. Total EBL was significantly lower in women undergoing balloon tamponade insertion during CS compared to controls (MD: -556.3, 95% CI -496 to -617.0, P=0.001). Likewise, women undergoing balloon tamponade insertion had significantly lower intra- (MD: -699.8, 95% CI -766.1 to -633.5, P=0.001) and post-operative (MD: -1162 mL (95% CI -1211.1 to -1134.4, P<0.001) compared to women who did undergo such procedure. Furthermore, women undergoing balloon tamponade insertion had a significantly lower risk of requiring additional surgical (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, I=0%; P=0.001) or medical (OR: 0.02, 95% CI 0.003-0.1, I=0; P=0.001) procedures to achieve hemostasis. Conversely, there was no significant difference in either the need for blood transfusion (P=0.071), admission to ICU (P=0.459) or need for hysterectomy (P=0.312) between women undergoing, compared to those not undergoing, balloon tamponade insertion during CS for placenta previa.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective balloon tamponade insertion at the time of CS for placenta previa seems to be associated with a lower EBL and a reduced risk of additional medical and surgical procedures to control hemostasis. Large and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these results and introduce elective balloon tamponade insertion at the time of CS for placenta previa in clinical practice.

摘要

引言

探讨球囊填塞术在前置胎盘妊娠中的作用。

证据获取

于10月17日通过电子方式检索了Medline、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库。纳入标准为剖宫产时接受球囊填塞术的前置胎盘女性,并与未接受该手术的女性进行比较。观察的结局包括总出血量、术中及术后估计失血量(EBL)、输血需求、入住重症监护病房(ICU)、子宫切除术以及为实现止血而进行的额外手术或医疗程序。根据所研究的结局,结果以合并比值比(OR)或平均差(MD)的形式报告。

证据综合

纳入了四项研究(共593名女性)。与对照组相比,剖宫产时接受球囊填塞术的女性总失血量显著更低(MD:-556.3,95%置信区间-496至-617.0,P = 0.001)。同样,接受球囊填塞术的女性术中(MD:-699.8,95%置信区间-766.1至-633.5,P = 0.001)和术后(MD:-1162 mL,95%置信区间-1211.1至-1134.4,P < 0.001)失血量也显著低于未接受该手术的女性。此外,接受球囊填塞术的女性需要额外手术(OR:0.16,95%置信区间0.1 - 0.5,I² = 0%;P = 0.001)或医疗(OR:0.02,95%置信区间0.003 - 0.1,I² = 0;P = 0.001)程序来实现止血的风险显著更低。相反,前置胎盘剖宫产时接受球囊填塞术与未接受该手术的女性在输血需求(P = 0.071)、入住ICU(P = 0.459)或子宫切除术需求(P = 0.312)方面均无显著差异。

结论

前置胎盘剖宫产时选择性插入球囊填塞术似乎与更低的失血量以及控制止血所需的额外医疗和手术程序风险降低有关。需要开展大规模且有足够效力的随机对照试验来验证这些结果,并在临床实践中引入前置胎盘剖宫产时选择性插入球囊填塞术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验