• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语、空间和听觉质量量表(SSQ5)筛查成人听力的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ5) for screening hearing in adults.

机构信息

Mestrado Profissional em Saúde da Comunicação Humana, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo - FCMSCSP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2022 Feb 28;34(4):e20210106. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021106. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212021106
PMID:35239794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886129/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of 5 questions of the SSQ in Brazilian Portuguese for its application as a hearing screening instrument in adults.

METHODS

A total of 135 adults with a mean age of 49.6 years and education of 9 years took part in the study. All subjects underwent hearing tests and were divided into 2 groups according to hearing acuity: G1 - 66 individuals with normal hearing on audiometric test: and G2 - 69 participants with impaired hearing on audiometric evaluation in one or both ears. The 5 items of the SSQ5, derived from the Brazilian Portuguese version of the SSQ49 were applied. The level of significance was set at a p-value ≤ 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

G1 subjects were younger and higher educated (p<0.01). A weak positive correlation was found between education and SSQ5 score only in G1. In G2, there was no correlation of age or education with SSQ5 performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the relationship between SSQ5 and audiometric average was 0.854 and p-value was <0.001 with bounds of 0.79 and 0.91. SSQ5 scores were lower in G2 (p<0.001). The cut-off point with optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was 7.3, yielding 80% accuracy, 81.8% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the SSQ5 proved suitable for screening hearing loss in adults, offering good accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for detecting hearing loss.

摘要

目的

研究 SSQ 中的 5 个问题在巴西葡萄牙语中的敏感性和特异性,以将其作为成人听力筛查工具应用。

方法

共有 135 名平均年龄为 49.6 岁、受教育程度为 9 年的成年人参与了这项研究。所有受试者均接受听力测试,并根据听力 acuity 分为两组:G1 - 66 名受试者在听力测试中听力正常;G2 - 69 名受试者在一只或两只耳朵的听力评估中听力受损。应用 SSQ5 的 5 个项目,该项目源自巴西葡萄牙语版的 SSQ49。显著性水平设置为 p 值≤0.05,置信区间为 95%。

结果

G1 组受试者年龄较小,受教育程度较高(p<0.01)。仅在 G1 中发现教育程度与 SSQ5 评分之间存在微弱的正相关。在 G2 中,年龄或教育程度与 SSQ5 表现之间没有相关性。SSQ5 与平均听力之间的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.854,p 值<0.001,范围为 0.79 至 0.91。G2 组的 SSQ5 评分较低(p<0.001)。具有最佳敏感性和特异性平衡的最佳截断点为 7.3,其准确率为 80%,敏感性为 81.8%,特异性为 78.3%。

结论

SSQ5 的巴西葡萄牙语版本适用于筛查成人听力损失,具有良好的准确性、敏感性和特异性,可检测听力损失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/9886129/3a48e36a5358/codas-34-4-e20210106-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/9886129/3a48e36a5358/codas-34-4-e20210106-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/9886129/3a48e36a5358/codas-34-4-e20210106-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and specificity of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ5) for screening hearing in adults.言语、空间和听觉质量量表(SSQ5)筛查成人听力的敏感性和特异性。
Codas. 2022 Feb 28;34(4):e20210106. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021106. eCollection 2022.
2
Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).通过言语、空间和听力质量量表测量临床正常听力和听力受损的中年人听力障碍,以及通过简化 SSQ(SSQ5)进行残疾筛查。
Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):615-6. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824e0ba7.
3
Self-assessment of hearing disabilities in cochlear implant users using the SSQ and the reduced SSQ5 version.使用 SSQ 和简化版 SSQ5 对人工耳蜗使用者的听力障碍进行自我评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1622-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce980.
4
Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.年龄会影响听力损失极小的成年人在言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)上的反应。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):81-91; quiz 139-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.2.
5
A New Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Short-Form: Factor, Cluster, and Comparative Analyses.一种新的言语、空间和听觉质量量表短式:因子、聚类和比较分析。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):938-950. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000675.
6
Sources of variability of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations.听力正常和听力受损人群中言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)分数的变异性来源。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(2):101-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1104734. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) in Brazilian Portuguese.巴西葡萄牙语版言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)的重测信度
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;23(4):e380-e383. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677754. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.法语版空间听力问卷的验证、聚类分析及与言语、空间和听力质量量表的比较
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):412-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269.
9
Sound quality in adult cochlear implant recipients using the HISQUI19.使用HISQUI19的成人人工耳蜗植入受者的声音质量
Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(11):1138-45. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1066934. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.升级为单通道言语处理器后单侧耳聋人工耳蜗使用者的听力表现
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):51-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000653.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Deficits Among People Experiencing Homelessness in an Australian Capital City: An Observational Study.澳大利亚首都城市无家可归者的健康缺陷:一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;22(2):135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020135.
2
Health Status of People Who Are and Are Not Experiencing Homelessness: Opportunities for Improvement.无家可归者和非无家可归者的健康状况:改进的机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 1;21(10):1313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101313.
3
Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.

本文引用的文献

1
Test-Retest Reliability of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) in Brazilian Portuguese.巴西葡萄牙语版言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)的重测信度
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;23(4):e380-e383. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677754. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
A New Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Short-Form: Factor, Cluster, and Comparative Analyses.一种新的言语、空间和听觉质量量表短式:因子、聚类和比较分析。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):938-950. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000675.
3
Self reported hearing difficulty, tinnitus, and normal audiometric thresholds, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.
用于感音神经性听力损失筛查的简化耳蜗频率选择性测量:与数字三音测试(DTT)和缩短的言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4391-4400. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07929-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
New horizons in holistic, person-centred health promotion for hearing healthcare.整体论和以人为中心的听力保健健康促进的新视野。
Age Ageing. 2023 Feb 1;52(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad020.
自我报告的听力困难、耳鸣以及正常听力测定阈值,1999 - 2002年国家健康和营养检查调查
Hear Res. 2018 Feb;358:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Iranian Version of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale: A Psychometric Study.伊朗版言语、空间和听力量表:一项心理测量学研究。
Acta Med Iran. 2016 Dec;54(12):756-764.
5
Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.法语版空间听力问卷的验证、聚类分析及与言语、空间和听力质量量表的比较
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):412-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269.
6
Sources of variability of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations.听力正常和听力受损人群中言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)分数的变异性来源。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(2):101-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1104734. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Prospective case-controlled sound localisation study after cochlear implantation in adults with single-sided deafness and ipsilateral tinnitus.成人单侧耳聋伴同侧耳鸣患者人工耳蜗植入术后前瞻性病例对照声音定位研究
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):511-8. doi: 10.1111/coa.12555. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.升级为单通道言语处理器后单侧耳聋人工耳蜗使用者的听力表现
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):51-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000653.
9
A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).SSQ(言语、空间和听觉质量量表)的因子分析。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53(2):101-14. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.824115. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
Self-assessment of hearing disabilities in cochlear implant users using the SSQ and the reduced SSQ5 version.使用 SSQ 和简化版 SSQ5 对人工耳蜗使用者的听力障碍进行自我评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1622-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce980.