Suppr超能文献

对比不同治疗策略对骨髓增生性肿瘤伴原始细胞增多(骨髓纤维化、慢性髓性白血病或特发性血小板增多症后)的疗效。

Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Blast-Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

机构信息

University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine. Tampa, FL; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Department of Malignant Hematology. Tampa, FL.

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Department of Malignant Hematology. Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jul;22(7):e521-e525. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.015. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Up to 20% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) will progress to blast phase (MPN-BP). Outcomes are dismal, with intensive chemotherapy providing little benefit. Low-intensity therapy is preferred due to better tolerability, but the prognosis remains poor. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is still the only potential for long term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To better evaluate the initial treatment approach in MPN-BP, we performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of 75 patients with MPN-BP treated at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2001 and 2021. Patients were stratified by initial treatment: best supportive care (BSC), hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy or intensive chemotherapy (IC).

RESULTS

Median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort was 4.8 months (BSC 0.8 months, HMA 4.7 months, and IC 11.4 months). Among IC patients, improved survival was evident in those that received AHSCT (mOS 40.8 months vs. 4.9 months, p < .01). Most patients that underwent AHSCT were initially treated with IC (p < .01). All patients that underwent AHSCT had achieved complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with improved survival were receipt of therapy (HMA or IC) (P = .017), CR/CRi (P = .037) and receipt of AHSCT (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

We show that active treatment with IC improves survival, but it is mostly tied to receipt of AHSCT. IC is a reasonable approach in appropriate patients as it can provide an effective bridge to AHSCT. Other treatment strategies such as molecularly targeted therapy and novel agents are desperately needed.

摘要

简介

高达 20%的骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)患者会进展为白血病期(MPN-BP)。由于强化化疗获益甚微,预后极差,结局不佳。由于更好的耐受性,低强度治疗是首选,但预后仍然很差。异基因造血干细胞移植(AHSCT)仍然是长期生存的唯一潜在方法。

患者和方法

为了更好地评估 MPN-BP 的初始治疗方法,我们对 2001 年至 2021 年在 Moffitt 癌症中心治疗的 75 例 MPN-BP 患者进行了单机构回顾性分析。根据初始治疗将患者分层:最佳支持治疗(BSC)、低甲基化药物(HMA)治疗或强化化疗(IC)。

结果

整个队列的中位总生存期(mOS)为 4.8 个月(BSC 为 0.8 个月,HMA 为 4.7 个月,IC 为 11.4 个月)。在 IC 患者中,接受 AHSCT 的患者生存得到改善(mOS 为 40.8 个月 vs. 4.9 个月,p <.01)。大多数接受 AHSCT 的患者最初接受 IC 治疗(p <.01)。所有接受 AHSCT 的患者均达到完全缓解(CR)或不完全血液学恢复的完全缓解(CRi)。多因素分析显示,改善生存的相关因素包括接受治疗(HMA 或 IC)(P =.017)、CR/CRi(P =.037)和接受 AHSCT(p <.001)。

结论

我们表明,接受 IC 的积极治疗可改善生存,但这主要与接受 AHSCT 有关。在适当的患者中,IC 是一种合理的方法,因为它可以有效地桥接 AHSCT。其他治疗策略,如分子靶向治疗和新型药物,迫切需要。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Blast-Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jul;22(7):e521-e525. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.015. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Impact of frontline treatment approach on outcomes of myeloid blast phase CML.
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Jun 15;14(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01106-1.
4
Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Acta Haematol. 2021;144(5):484-499. doi: 10.1159/000512929. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm.
Blood Cancer J. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):108. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00878-8.
7
Outcomes and predictors of survival in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Leuk Res. 2018 Jul;70:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasm in blast phase.
Leuk Res. 2012 Sep;36(9):1147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.04.021. Epub 2012 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
How I treat secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
Blood. 2025 Mar 20;145(12):1260-1272. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024011.

本文引用的文献

1
Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Acta Haematol. 2021;144(5):484-499. doi: 10.1159/000512929. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Outcome of patients with IDH1/2-mutated post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML in the era of IDH inhibitors.
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5336-5342. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001528.
5
Bcl-xL represents a therapeutic target in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.
J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Sep;24(18):10978-10986. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15730. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Blood. 2020 Jul 2;136(1):61-70. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000943.
7
Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis.
Blood Adv. 2020 May 12;4(9):1965-1973. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084.
9
Clinical Benefit Derived from Decitabine Therapy for Advanced Phases of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Acta Haematol. 2021;144(1):48-57. doi: 10.1159/000506146. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
A phase 1/2 study of ruxolitinib and decitabine in patients with post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia.
Leukemia. 2020 Sep;34(9):2489-2492. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0778-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验