Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
Blood Adv. 2020 May 12;4(9):1965-1973. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.
异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)是治疗骨髓纤维化(MF)的唯一根治性疗法。在这项大型多中心回顾性研究中,使用 Cox 比例风险模型分析了接受异基因 HCT(551 例)和未接受 HCT(非 HCT)(1377 例)治疗的 MF 患者的总生存期(OS)。通过动态国际预后评分系统(DIPSS)分层的生存分析显示,由于移植相关死亡率(TRM)的 upfront 风险,与非 HCT 相比,HCT 治疗与较差的 OS 相关(非 HCT 与 HCT:DIPSS 中危 1 [Int-1]:风险比 [HR] = 0.26,P <.0001;DIPSS-Int-2 和更高危:HR,0.39,P <.0001)。同样,在 DIPSS 低危 MF 组中,由于 upfront TRM 风险,与 HCT 相比,非 HCT 治疗在治疗后第一年的 OS 更优(HR,0.16,P =.006)。然而,1 年后,OS 无显著差异(HR,1.38,P =.451)。超过治疗后 1 年,在 Int-1 和更高 DIPSS 评分的患者中观察到 HCT 治疗的 OS 优势(非 HCT 与 HCT:DIPSS-Int-1:HR,2.64,P <.0001;DIPSS-Int-2 和更高危:HR,2.55,P <.0001)。总之,在 Int-1 或更高危 MF 患者中观察到 HCT 治疗的长期 OS 优势,但代价是早期 TRM。随着 DIPSS 风险评分的增加,HCT 带来的 OS 获益幅度增加,且随着随访时间的延长而变得明显。