Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):973-978. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12789.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma.
Between 2000 and 2020, a total of 75 patients undergoing radical resection for ampullary carcinoma were included. The efficacy index (EI) was calculated by multiplication of the frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM) at the station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis at the station.
Out of 75 patients, 14 had LNM. The EI for the peri-pancreatic head (station 13 and 17) and superior mesenteric artery (station 14) lymph node were 4.4 and 3.5, respectively. Whereas the peri-gastric (station 5 and 6), common hepatic artery (station 8), and liver hilum (station 12) lymph node stations had zero EI. Although the number of patients with the station 16 dissected was small (9%), the para-aortic (station 16) lymph nodes had the highest EI of 14.3 despite being distant lymph nodes.
We identified the distribution of LNM and survival benefit of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma. Our results suggest that the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma could be reconsidered.
背景/目的:对于壶腹癌,淋巴结清扫的最佳范围仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨淋巴结清扫术治疗壶腹癌的疗效。
回顾性分析 2000 年至 2020 年间接受根治性切除术的 75 例壶腹癌患者的临床资料。采用乘积法计算淋巴结转移频率(LNM)和转移部位 5 年生存率,计算疗效指数(EI)。
75 例患者中,14 例发生 LNM。胰头周围(站 13 和 17)和肠系膜上动脉(站 14)淋巴结的 EI 分别为 4.4 和 3.5。胃周(站 5 和 6)、肝总动脉(站 8)和肝门(站 12)淋巴结的 EI 均为 0。尽管站 16 淋巴结清扫的患者数量较少(9%),但远隔淋巴结的站 16 腹主动脉旁淋巴结的 EI 最高,为 14.3。
本研究确定了壶腹癌淋巴结转移的分布和淋巴结清扫术对生存获益的影响。结果提示,需要重新考虑壶腹癌淋巴结清扫的最佳范围。