文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

不同胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效

Clinical Efficacy of Different Thoracoscopic Surgeries for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Wang Tao, Liu Xi, Chen Lei, Liang Tao, Ning Xiaokuang

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Feb 15;9:842047. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842047. eCollection 2022.


DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.842047
PMID:35242806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885516/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of different thoracoscopic procedures in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and their correlation with matrix metalloproteinase-7 mRNA (MMPs-7 mRNA) and soluble major histocompatibility complex class I molecule A (sMICA), as well as their effect on T-cell subsets. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received different thoracoscopic surgeries were divided into the Control group (three-port thoracoscopic surgery) and the study group (single-port thoracoscopic surgery). The two groups were evaluated to compare the perioperative indicators, MMPs-7 mRNA, sMICA expression levels, T-cell subsets, postoperative pain, complication rates, and prognostic outcomes at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The operation time, blood loss, drainage tube placement time, incision length, and hospital stay in the study group were less than those in the control group ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the two groups ( > 0.05). After 3 days, the expression levels of MMPs-7 mRNA and sMICA in the study group were lower than those in the control group ( < 0.05); CD4 +, CD8 +, and CD4 +/CD8 + in the study group were higher than those in the control group ( < 0.05). On days 1, 3, and 5, the visual analog score (VAS) of the study group was lower than that of the control group ( < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two follow-up groups ( > 0.05), in which all patients completed the follow-up. After 1 year of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate between the two groups ( > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with three-port thoracoscopic surgery, single-port thoracoscopic surgery can improve perioperative expression, shorten hospital stay, reduce serum tumor micrometastasis levels, improve immune metastasis mechanisms and reduce pain, which is of great significance to patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It is an effective, convenient, and safe surgical option that deserves wide clinical reference.

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析不同胸腔镜手术方式对非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效,及其与基质金属蛋白酶-7信使核糖核酸(MMPs-7 mRNA)和可溶性主要组织相容性复合体I类分子A(sMICA)的相关性,以及对T细胞亚群的影响。 方法:将100例行不同胸腔镜手术的非小细胞肺癌患者分为对照组(三孔胸腔镜手术)和研究组(单孔胸腔镜手术)。对两组患者的围手术期指标、MMPs-7 mRNA、sMICA表达水平、T细胞亚群、术后疼痛、并发症发生率及1年随访时的预后结果进行评估并比较。 结果:研究组的手术时间、出血量、引流管放置时间、切口长度及住院时间均少于对照组(P<0.05)。两组间淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3天,研究组MMPs-7 mRNA和sMICA的表达水平低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的CD4+、CD8+及CD4+/CD8+高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第1、3及5天,研究组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组(P<0.05);两组随访期间并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),所有患者均完成随访。随访1年后,两组间无瘤生存率和总生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论:与三孔胸腔镜手术相比,单孔胸腔镜手术可改善围手术期指标,缩短住院时间,降低血清肿瘤微转移水平,改善免疫转移机制并减轻疼痛,对非小细胞肺癌患者具有重要意义。是一种有效、便捷且安全的手术方式,值得临床广泛参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/8885516/5d06129aa605/fsurg-09-842047-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/8885516/5d06129aa605/fsurg-09-842047-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/8885516/5d06129aa605/fsurg-09-842047-g0001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Clinical Efficacy of Different Thoracoscopic Surgeries for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Front Surg. 2022-2-15

[2]
Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer.

Oncol Lett. 2019-8

[3]
Clinical Efficacy of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Three-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.

J Oncol. 2022-5-14

[4]
Midterm outcomes of single port thoracoscopic surgery for major pulmonary resection.

PLoS One. 2017-11-14

[5]
Effectiveness and postoperative pain level of single-port versus two-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021-2

[6]
Comparison of the perioperative efficacy between single-port and two-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery anatomical lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Thorac Dis. 2019-7

[7]
Preliminary results of single-port versus triple-port complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Ann Transl Med. 2015-5

[8]
Perioperative Effect of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy and Three-Port Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Early Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2023

[9]
Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital.

Transl Cancer Res. 2021-7

[10]
Efficacy of multi-groove silicone drains in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery and their effect on C-reactive protein: a single-center experience.

J Thorac Dis. 2021-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparison of the Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Open Thoracotomy for Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Single Cohort Study with 269 Cases.

Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020-9-4

[2]
Prognostic significance of ERCC1, RRM1, TOP1, TOP2A, TYMS, TUBB3, GSTP1 AND BRCA1 mRNA expressions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving a platinum-based chemotherapy.

J BUON. 2020

[3]
Single-Port vs Conventional Three-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Wedge Resection: Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Surgical Costs.

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021-4-20

[4]
Comparison of efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy and thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

J BUON. 2020

[5]
Feasibility and effectiveness of thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-1

[6]
Are segmentectomy and lobectomy comparable in terms of curative intent for early stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020-7

[7]
Early postoperative inflammatory response by procedure types: stapler-based segmentectomy versus lobectomy.

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020-3

[8]
[A Review on Comparison of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in the Treatment of 
Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2019-8-20

[9]
Circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity: a biomarker for resectable non-small cell lung cancer?

J BUON. 2019

[10]
Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer.

Oncol Lett. 2019-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索