Suppr超能文献

急性护理护士的护理教育:镰状细胞病的疼痛机制。

Nursing Education for the Acute Care Nurse on Pain Mechanisms of Sickle Cell Disease.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022 Mar;53(3):137-144. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20220210-09. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Abstract

Background It is unknown whether nurses' knowledge about pain among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) reflects the current standard of care. The authors evaluated changes in nurses' knowledge and simulated practice behavior after a continuing education program. Method Inpatient nurses completed an e-learning program on SCD pain; a pretest and a posttest with the same 10 questions; and two patient cases with four pain intervention options at the posttest. Results On the pretest, the mean percentage of correct answers was 83% ( = 13%). The mean percentage of correct answers increased by 12% ( < .0001) on the posttest. For the first simulated patient case, 100% ( = 31) of the nurses selected an appropriate pain intervention option based on the patient-reported pain score. For the second simulated patient case, 84% ( = 26) did so. Conclusion Increased knowledge does not always translate into simulated practice change. The reasons for this are unknown, but they could include implicit bias from exposure to patients who have high use of acute care, although the minority of patients with SCD fit this description. .

摘要

背景 护士对镰状细胞病(SCD)患者疼痛的了解程度是否反映了当前的护理标准尚不清楚。作者评估了继续教育计划后护士知识和模拟实践行为的变化。

方法 住院护士完成了 SCD 疼痛的电子学习计划;进行了预测试和后测试,每个测试都有 10 个相同的问题;在后测试中还有两个患者病例和四个疼痛干预选项。

结果 在预测试中,正确答案的平均百分比为 83%(=13%)。在后测试中,正确答案的平均百分比增加了 12%(<0.0001)。对于第一个模拟患者病例,根据患者报告的疼痛评分,100%(=31)的护士选择了适当的疼痛干预选项。对于第二个模拟患者病例,84%(=26)的护士选择了适当的疼痛干预选项。

结论 知识的增加并不总是转化为模拟实践的改变。其原因尚不清楚,但可能包括由于接触到急性护理使用率高的患者而产生的隐性偏见,尽管少数 SCD 患者符合这种描述。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验