Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;57(6):1273-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02248-4. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
We investigated the relationships between physical isolation at home during the period when many US states had shelter-in-place orders and subsequent longitudinal trajectories of depression, anxiety, and loneliness in older adults over a 6 month follow-up.
Data were from monthly online questionnaires with US adults aged ≥ 55 in the nation-wide COVID-19 Coping Study (April through October 2020, N = 3978). Physical isolation was defined as not leaving home except for essential purposes (0, 1-3, 4-6, and 7 days in the past week), measured at baseline (April-May). Outcomes were depressive symptoms (8-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), anxiety symptoms (5-item Beck Anxiety Inventory), and loneliness (3-item UCLA loneliness scale), measured monthly (April-October). Multivariable, population- and attrition-weighted linear mixed-effects models assessed the relationships between baseline physical isolation with mental health symptoms at baseline and over time.
Physical isolation (7 days versus 0 days in the past week) was associated with elevated depressive symptoms (adjusted β = 0.85; 95% CI 0.10-1.60), anxiety symptoms (adjusted β = 1.22; 95% CI 0.45-1.98), and loneliness (adjusted β = 1.06; 95% CI 0.51-1.61) at baseline, but not with meaningful rate of change in these mental health outcomes over time. The symptom burden of each mental health outcome increased with increasing past-week frequency of physical isolation.
During the early COVID-19 pandemic, physical isolation was associated with elevated depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and loneliness, which persisted over time. These findings highlight the unique and persistent mental health risks of physical isolation at home under pandemic control measures.
我们调查了在许多美国州发布就地避难令期间居家物理隔离与老年人在 6 个月随访期间抑郁、焦虑和孤独感的纵向轨迹之间的关系。
数据来自全国性 COVID-19 应对研究的每月在线问卷,参与者为年龄≥55 岁的美国成年人(2020 年 4 月至 10 月,N=3978)。物理隔离的定义是除了必要的目的(过去一周内每天离开家的 0、1-3、4-6 和 7 天),在基线(4-5 月)测量。结果为抑郁症状(8 项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)、焦虑症状(5 项贝克焦虑量表)和孤独感(3 项加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表),每月测量(4-10 月)。多变量、人群和流失加权线性混合效应模型评估了基线物理隔离与基线和随时间变化的心理健康症状之间的关系。
与过去一周每天物理隔离 0 天相比,隔离 7 天与基线时的抑郁症状(调整后的β=0.85;95%CI 0.10-1.60)、焦虑症状(调整后的β=1.22;95%CI 0.45-1.98)和孤独感(调整后的β=1.06;95%CI 0.51-1.61)升高相关,但与这些心理健康结果随时间的变化率没有显著关系。每种心理健康结局的症状负担随着过去一周物理隔离频率的增加而增加。
在 COVID-19 大流行早期,物理隔离与抑郁、焦虑和孤独感的增加有关,且这些症状随时间持续存在。这些发现强调了在大流行控制措施下居家物理隔离对心理健康的独特和持久风险。