Suppr超能文献

处理减少伤害服务可及性低的问题:瑞典小城市吸毒者的策略和风险环境的定性研究。

Dealing with low access to harm reduction: a qualitative study of the strategies and risk environments of people who use drugs in a small Swedish city.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Citadellsvägen 7, 211 18, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 4;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00602-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of harm reduction has been limited in many areas of Sweden. This study aims to understand the implications that this has for the life circumstances and risk management of people who use drugs in areas of low access.

METHODS

Eleven qualitative, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with people who use drugs in a small urban centre with no needle and syringe exchange program (NSP) or Housing First policy.

RESULTS

Participants reported many solutions to lack of NSP, including travel to an external NSP, creating bridging distribution networks, stealing, borrowing, reusing, ordering online, and smuggling injection equipment. They were at risk of having their equipment confiscated by police. Participants were mostly homeless, and to address exclusion from housing services, were forced to frequently find new temporary solutions, sheltering themselves in public places, with friends, in cars, among others. Participants felt the lack of services reflected stigmatized notions of drug use and heightened their exclusion from general society. For example, they avoided accessing other health care services for fear of discrimination. These issues caused high levels of stress and anxiety, in addition to serious risk for many somatic and psychological health conditions, including HIV and HCV transmission.

CONCLUSION

Lack of harm reduction services placed a great burden on study participants to develop strategies due to gaps in official programming. It also contributes to a vicious cycle of exclusion from services. The implementation of such evidence-based programs will reduce this burden, as well as provide the indirect, symbolic effect of inclusion.

摘要

背景

在瑞典的许多地区,减少伤害的发展受到了限制。本研究旨在了解这对低服务获取地区吸毒者的生活环境和风险管理意味着什么。

方法

在一个没有针头和注射器交换计划(NSP)或“先住后付”政策的小型城市中心,对 11 名吸毒者进行了 11 次定性、半结构式访谈。

结果

参与者报告了许多缺乏 NSP 的解决方案,包括前往外部 NSP、创建桥梁分发网络、偷窃、借用、重复使用、在线订购和走私注射设备。他们有被警察没收设备的风险。参与者大多无家可归,为了解决被住房服务排斥的问题,他们被迫频繁寻找新的临时解决方案,在公共场所、在朋友家、在汽车里等地方避难。参与者感到服务的缺乏反映了对吸毒的污名化观念,并加剧了他们被社会排斥的程度。例如,他们担心受到歧视,避免了寻求其他医疗保健服务。这些问题给他们带来了很大的压力和焦虑,除了对许多躯体和心理健康状况(包括 HIV 和 HCV 传播)造成严重风险之外。

结论

由于官方方案存在差距,缺乏减少伤害的服务给研究参与者带来了很大的负担,需要他们制定策略。这也导致了他们进一步被服务排斥的恶性循环。实施这些基于证据的方案将减轻这种负担,并提供间接的、象征性的包容效应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验