Choong Elaine Kar Man, Gallagher Jennifer E, Patel Rakhee
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Community Oral Health & Clinical Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Gerodontology. 2023 Mar;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/ger.12622. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
The United Kingdom (UK) has a well-developed health and social care system, and strong research governance. However, there is limited evidence to guide best research practice among vulnerable older people in care homes and there is no consensus on clinical trial methodology that is deliverable in this setting.
To review the literature on trials conducted among older adults residing in care homes within the UK and collate evidence on their methodological characteristics and outcomes.
A systematic rapid review methodology was employed. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched in two incremental stages: stage 1 searched for oral health-related trials conducted within the UK care homes up to July 2021, whereas stage 2 sought for general health-related trials in the same setting from 2011 to 2021. The quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Findings were summarised descriptively.
Five oral health and 33 general health-related trials involving care home residents were included for analysis. The most common trial design was parallel group with two arms (n = 25) involving individual randomisation (n = 21). Consent was mainly obtained from residents and/or their proxies (n = 24), followed by residents only (n = 13) and care homes only (n = 1). Based on available data, the number needed to screen to recruit one participant ranged from 2 to 40 (median: 3; Q1-Q3: 2-9). Attrition rates ranged from 0% to 73% (median: 21%; Q1-Q3: 13%-32%) for follow-up periods between 1 and 52 weeks. The studies were of mixed methodological quality.
This rapid review outlines the methodological characteristics and outcomes of trials conducted among older adults in UK care homes. The findings of this review provide valuable information to assist in navigating and designing future research in this complex setting.
英国拥有完善的健康和社会护理体系以及强大的研究治理体系。然而,在指导养老院中弱势老年人的最佳研究实践方面,证据有限,并且对于在此环境下可行的临床试验方法也没有达成共识。
回顾在英国养老院中针对老年人开展的试验的相关文献,并整理有关其方法学特征和结果的证据。
采用系统快速回顾方法。分两个递增阶段检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL:第一阶段检索截至2021年7月在英国养老院中开展的与口腔健康相关的试验,而第二阶段检索2011年至2021年在同一环境下开展的与一般健康相关的试验。使用Cochrane的RoB 2和ROBINS-I工具评估纳入研究的质量。结果进行描述性总结。
纳入五项与口腔健康相关的试验和33项与一般健康相关的、涉及养老院居民的试验进行分析。最常见的试验设计是双臂平行组(n = 25),涉及个体随机分组(n = 21)。同意主要从居民和/或其代理人处获得(n = 24),其次是仅从居民处获得(n = 13)和仅从养老院获得(n = 1)。根据现有数据,招募一名参与者所需筛查的人数范围为2至40(中位数:3;第一四分位数 - 第三四分位数:2 - 9)。随访期为1至52周时,失访率范围为0%至73%(中位数:21%;第一四分位数 - 第三四分位数:13% - 32%)。这些研究的方法学质量参差不齐。
本快速回顾概述了在英国养老院中针对老年人开展的试验的方法学特征和结果。本回顾的结果提供了有价值的信息,有助于在这一复杂环境中开展和设计未来的研究。