Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):1029-1037. doi: 10.1111/hex.13448. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Better transparency of research results and participant engagement may help address poor participant accrual in paediatric clinical research. We conducted formative research to assess the acceptability of lay summaries and thank you notes, as well as to refine and expand guidance on participant and family engagement in Pediatric Trials Network's (PTN) pragmatic paediatric clinical research.
Informed by draft PTN guidance, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with adolescent clinical trial participants and caregivers of paediatric participants in four trials conducted by PTN across eight sites. Participants were shown multiple versions of mock lay summaries and thank you notes and asked questions on their preferences for content and layout, and on trial communications. We used applied thematic analysis to analyse the data.
We interviewed 27 individuals engaged in PTN research: 24 caregivers and 3 adolescents. During a trial, participants want regular updates on study progress, reminders of the study purpose and reassurances of data confidentiality. After the trial, participants want to learn the aggregated results, particularly medication effectiveness. Participants reported that lay summaries should include a review of the study's purpose, methods and length, and that they expect to learn individual-level results. Participants stated that thank you notes must be of sufficient length to be meaningful.
This is the first study to describe stakeholder preferences for thank you note content and layout. Using these findings, we finalized PTN's trial communication guidance for use in future PTN trials. Research is needed to determine the effect of lay summaries and thank you notes on improving public transparency regarding clinical trials and paediatric trial recruitment and completion.
By design, stakeholders (adolescent trial participants and caregivers of pediatric trial participants) contributed to PTN's guidance on the content and layout of lay summaries and thank you notes through their participation in the in-depth interviews.
提高研究结果和参与者参与度的透明度可能有助于解决儿科临床研究中参与者入组率低的问题。我们进行了形成性研究,以评估通俗摘要和感谢信的可接受性,以及完善和扩展儿科试验网络(PTN)实用儿科临床研究中关于参与者和家属参与的指导。
根据 PTN 指南草案,我们对来自四个由 PTN 开展的、跨越八个地点的试验的青少年临床试验参与者和儿科参与者的照顾者进行了深入的定性访谈。参与者观看了多个版本的模拟通俗摘要和感谢信,并就内容和布局以及试验沟通提出了他们的偏好问题。我们使用应用主题分析来分析数据。
我们共采访了 27 名参与 PTN 研究的人员:24 名照顾者和 3 名青少年。在试验期间,参与者希望定期收到研究进展的更新、提醒研究目的以及保证数据机密性。试验结束后,参与者希望了解汇总结果,特别是药物的有效性。参与者报告说,通俗摘要应包括研究目的、方法和长度的回顾,并且他们希望了解个体水平的结果。参与者表示,感谢信的篇幅必须足够长才有意义。
这是第一项描述利益相关者对感谢信内容和布局偏好的研究。利用这些发现,我们最终确定了 PTN 用于未来 PTN 试验的试验沟通指南。需要研究通俗摘要和感谢信是否能提高公众对临床试验和儿科试验招募和完成的透明度。
通过设计,利益相关者(青少年试验参与者和儿科试验参与者的照顾者)通过参与深入访谈,为 PTN 通俗摘要和感谢信的内容和布局指南提供了意见。