General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China.
Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Jul;47(7):897-904. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13637. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based regimen remains decreasing. Vonoprazan (VPZ), a stronger and longer-lasting acid blocker, has been proposed to treatment of H. pylori infection. However, previous reviews did not have a pre-established study protocol and did not conduct a comprehensive search of the database, so the results obtained were not robust. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of VPZ-based regimens for treatment of H. pylori infection in comparison with other regimens. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials and ChiCTR Register. Randomized clinical trials comparing VPZ-based regimens with similar eradication regimens without VPZ in the treatment of H. pylori infection were included. Eradication rate, compliance of the patients and side effects were specified as the primary outcomes. RevMan 5.4 software was used to analyze the RCTs and provide pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Systematic searches, study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis were performed by two independent researchers according to the predesigned criteria on the PROSPERO. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 8 RCTs with 2012 patients qualified for evaluation. The results showed that the eradication rate of VPZ-containing regimens was significantly superior to PPI-containing regimens for both intention-to-treat (RR, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.06-1.23; p = 0.0006) and per-protocol analyses (RR, 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.20; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis based on treatment regimens, eradication experience and clarithromycin resistance, as well as sensitivity analysis further confirmed this finding. In addition, there was no significant difference in compliance (RR, 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98-0.1.05; p = 0.35) and the frequency of adverse events (RR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.00; p = 0.05) between the regimens. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Compared with PPI-based regimens, the VPZ-containing regimens showed a comparable or even superior eradication rate of H. pylori in terms of overall comparison and comparison of different treatment regimens, eradication experience and clarithromycin resistance. In addition, VPZ-based regimens have better tolerability and fewer adverse events. More future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of some differences in patient characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021229598.
已知和目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为基础的方案根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)的成功率仍在下降。伏诺拉生(VPZ)是一种更强效、更持久的胃酸阻滞剂,已被提议用于治疗 H. pylori 感染。然而,以前的综述没有预先设定的研究方案,也没有对数据库进行全面搜索,因此得到的结果不够可靠。我们旨在进行荟萃分析,以评估基于 VPZ 的方案与其他方案治疗 H. pylori 感染的疗效和安全性。
方法:我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials 和 ChiCTR 注册中心进行了系统文献检索。纳入了比较 VPZ 为基础的方案与不含 VPZ 的类似根除方案治疗 H. pylori 感染的随机临床试验。根除率、患者的依从性和不良反应被指定为主要结局。使用 RevMan 5.4 软件分析 RCT,并提供具有 95%置信区间(CI)的合并风险比(RR)。根据预设的标准,两项独立研究人员进行了系统搜索、研究选择、数据提取、偏倚风险评估和统计分析。
结果和讨论:共有 8 项 RCT 共 2012 名患者符合评估标准。结果表明,VPZ 组的根除率在意向治疗(RR,1.14;95%CI:1.06-1.23;p=0.0006)和方案分析(RR,1.12;95%CI:1.04-1.20;p=0.003)方面均显著优于 PPI 组。基于治疗方案、根除经验和克拉霉素耐药性的亚组分析以及敏感性分析进一步证实了这一发现。此外,两组的依从性(RR,1.02;95%CI:0.98-1.05;p=0.35)和不良反应发生率(RR,0.84;95%CI:0.70-1.00;p=0.05)无显著差异。
创新与结论:与 PPI 为基础的方案相比,VPZ 为基础的方案在总体比较和不同治疗方案、根除经验和克拉霉素耐药性的比较中,显示出了相当甚至更高的 H. pylori 根除率。此外,VPZ 为基础的方案具有更好的耐受性和更少的不良反应。需要更多的未来研究来评估患者特征差异的影响。
试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42021229598。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024-3-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-12-11
World J Gastroenterol. 2025-7-28
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024-11
J Korean Med Sci. 2024-1-29
J Pharm Technol. 2023-6
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023-4-27