• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲外国直接投资对生态足迹的空间影响。

Spatial impact of foreign direct investment on ecological footprint in Africa.

机构信息

College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Kingsway Campus, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51589-51608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18831-w. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-18831-w
PMID:35247175
Abstract

This study examines the spatial impact of FDI on ecological footprint of 31 African countries. In achieving this, the study uses the Driscoll-Kraay (1998) random effect model, fixed-effect instrumental variable regression, and the spatial Durbin model. There are three main important findings from this empirical study. First, FDI has a nonlinear impact on ecological footprint in Africa. At the initial stage, FDI reduces ecological footprint up to a threshold of $404.75-$669.96 million, before the impact increases ecological degradation. This result is robust to the instrumental regression model. Second, the results further reveal a significant spatial spillover of FDI on ecological footprint in Africa. Third, the empirical results provide evidence of both direct and spillover effects of environmental degradation determinant in Africa. This denotes that environmental quality of a particular country influences the environmental quality of other neighbouring countries. While it is important to attract significant amount of foreign investment to Africa, this study recommends that African governments need to improve their environmental regulations and laws to achieve transfer of energy-saving technology from foreign investors.

摘要

本研究考察了外国直接投资对 31 个非洲国家生态足迹的空间影响。为此,本研究使用了 Driscoll-Kraay(1998)随机效应模型、固定效应工具变量回归和空间杜宾模型。这项实证研究有三个主要发现。首先,外国直接投资对非洲的生态足迹有非线性影响。在初始阶段,外国直接投资减少生态足迹,直到达到 4.0475 亿至 6.6996 亿美元的阈值,然后才会增加生态退化的影响。这一结果在工具回归模型中是稳健的。其次,研究结果进一步揭示了外国直接投资对非洲生态足迹的显著空间溢出效应。第三,实证结果提供了非洲环境退化决定因素的直接和溢出效应的证据。这意味着一个国家的环境质量会影响其他邻国的环境质量。虽然吸引大量外国投资对非洲很重要,但本研究建议非洲政府需要改善其环境法规,以实现从外国投资者转移节能技术。

相似文献

1
Spatial impact of foreign direct investment on ecological footprint in Africa.非洲外国直接投资对生态足迹的空间影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51589-51608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18831-w. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression.外国直接投资是否会损害生态足迹?面板分位数回归的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):14372-14385. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11518-0. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Ecological implication of offshored economic activities in Turkey: foreign direct investment perspective.土耳其离岸经济活动的生态影响:外国直接投资视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(30):38015-38028. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09629-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
Income inequality, ecological footprint, and carbon dioxide emissions in Asian developing economies: what effects what and how?亚洲发展中经济体的收入不平等、生态足迹和二氧化碳排放:什么影响什么,以及如何影响?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):24660-24671. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17582-4. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation.“一带一路”国家金融发展对生态足迹的影响:基于面板数据估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(6):6199-6208. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Environmental strategies for achieving a new foreign direct investment golden decade in Algeria.实现阿尔及利亚新外国直接投资黄金十年的环境战略。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37660-37675. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18149-z. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
7
An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易政策和生态足迹之间的经验关系:中上收入国家按大洲的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):38995-39018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Effect of foreign direct investment on environmental quality in West Africa.外国直接投资对西非环境质量的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):57788-57800. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26545-w. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN+3 Countries: The Role of Environmental Degradation.东盟+3 国家吸引外国直接投资的决定因素:环境恶化的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031720.
10
Impact of political conflict on foreign direct investments in the mining sector: Evidence from the event study and spatial estimation.政治冲突对采矿业外国直接投资的影响:来自事件研究和空间估计的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jan 15;350:119590. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119590. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Is climate change hindering the economic progress of Nigerian economy? Insights from dynamic models.气候变化是否正在阻碍尼日利亚经济的发展?来自动态模型的见解。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 11;10(20):e39288. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39288. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
2
Asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment and globalization on ecological footprint in Indonesia.外国直接投资和全球化对印度尼西亚生态足迹的不对称影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 26;19(1):e0297046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297046. eCollection 2024.