• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆总管直径大于或等于 8 毫米是行胆总管一期缝合的安全直径:单臂荟萃分析和系统评价。

Greater than or equal to 8 mm is a safe diameter of common bile duct for primary duct closure: single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.

Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Hydatid Disease Research, Xining, 810000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;15(3):513-521. doi: 10.1007/s12328-022-01615-7. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12328-022-01615-7
PMID:35247181
Abstract

Greater than or equal to 8 mm was often used as the safe diameter of primary duct closure (PDC) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in previous studies, but it is impossible to verify the source of this safe diameter, and lack of evidence for the safe diameter of PDC. Hence, this study evaluates the incidence of postoperative complications by single-arm meta-analysis to demonstrate the feasibility of using 8 mm as the safe diameter of PDC, so as to provide reference for clinical selection. Eligible studies were searched by MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1995 to May 2021, investigating eligible literature using PDC after LCBDE for methods of common bile duct closure. The single-arm meta-analysis was analyzed by "meta" package under R 4.0.5, and the pooled incidence of postoperative complications was calculated. Twelve literatures were enrolled in this single-arm meta-analysis including 792 patients. The pooled complications rate including total complications (13.1%, 95% CI 10.1-15.6%), total biliary duct-related complications (9.4%, 95% CI 7.4-11.6%), residual stones (1.3%, 95% CI 0.3-2.7%), bile leakage (5.1%, 95% CI 3.5-6.9%), postoperative pneumonia (2.1%, 95% CI 0.8-3.8%), postoperative acute pancreatitis (1.8%, 95% CI 0.2-4.3%), and stone recurrence (2.6%, 95% CI 1.1-4.4%). The clinical indication of PDC after LCBDE should follow that the diameter of common bile duct ≥ 8 mm as the safe diameter.

摘要

在之前的研究中,腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)后,常将大于或等于 8mm 作为原发性胆管闭合(PDC)的安全直径,但无法验证此安全直径的来源,也缺乏 PDC 安全直径的证据。因此,本研究通过单臂荟萃分析评估术后并发症的发生率,以证明使用 8mm 作为 PDC 的安全直径的可行性,为临床选择提供参考。通过 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Web of Science 自 1995 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月检索合格研究,使用 LCBDE 后 PDC 方法对胆总管闭合的合格文献进行调查。使用 R 4.0.5 中的“meta”包对单臂荟萃分析进行分析,并计算术后并发症的总发生率。本单臂荟萃分析共纳入 12 项文献,共 792 例患者。总并发症(13.1%,95%CI 10.1-15.6%)、总胆管相关并发症(9.4%,95%CI 7.4-11.6%)、残余结石(1.3%,95%CI 0.3-2.7%)、胆漏(5.1%,95%CI 3.5-6.9%)、术后肺炎(2.1%,95%CI 0.8-3.8%)、术后急性胰腺炎(1.8%,95%CI 0.2-4.3%)和结石复发(2.6%,95%CI 1.1-4.4%)的汇总发生率。LCBDE 后 PDC 的临床适应证应遵循胆总管直径≥8mm 作为安全直径。

相似文献

1
Greater than or equal to 8 mm is a safe diameter of common bile duct for primary duct closure: single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review.胆总管直径大于或等于 8 毫米是行胆总管一期缝合的安全直径:单臂荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;15(3):513-521. doi: 10.1007/s12328-022-01615-7. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆总管探查加一期胆管缝合术治疗胆总管结石的各种方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Jun;17(3):183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
3
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration.胆总管切开探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD005640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005640.pub2.
4
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
5
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration.腹腔镜胆总管结石探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD005641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub2.
6
Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术与腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):5918-5935. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08648-y. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
7
NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.美国国立卫生研究院关于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)用于诊断和治疗的科学现状声明。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(1):1-26.
8
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones after gastric surgery.胃手术后腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2185-2190. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11554-2. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary closure with self-disengaging biliary stent following laparoscopic CBD exploration in normal-diameter ducts: a propensity score matching study.正常直径胆管腹腔镜胆总管探查术后使用自脱式胆管支架进行一期缝合:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04949-7.
2
Laparoscopic primary suture of the common bile duct in patients with common bile duct stones: a comparative analysis of two suturing methods in terms of safety, efficacy, and convenience with 16-month follow-up.胆总管结石患者腹腔镜下胆总管一期缝合术:两种缝合方法在安全性、有效性和便利性方面的比较分析及16个月随访
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02904-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Transcholecystic approach for distal common bile duct stricture in a non-dilated biliary system: an alternative route.非扩张性胆道系统中胆总管远端狭窄的经胆囊途径:一种替代路径。
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Dec 29;12(12):e231153. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231153.
2
Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后使用无结倒刺缝线一期缝合与传统T管引流的比较:单中心中期经验
J Int Med Res. 2020 Jan;48(1):300060519878087. doi: 10.1177/0300060519878087. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Cirsoid aneurysm of scalp: demonstration on CT angiography (CTA).
Is an 8 mm cutoff necessary when performing primary common bile duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration?
腹腔镜胆总管探查术后进行一期胆总管缝合时,8毫米的截断值是否必要?
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2636-2642. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.9441.
4
Bile metabolites as diagnostic biomarkers for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.胆汁代谢物作为肝门部胆管癌的诊断生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):3177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27603-6.
5
Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜胆道探查术后胆管结石患者的一期缝合:一项回顾性队列研究
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):897-903. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01451-5. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
头皮蔓状动脉瘤:CT血管造影(CTA)表现
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Dec 11;2013:bcr2013202459. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202459.
4
Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis.胆总管结石患者治疗后的长期预后。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):97-102. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000077923.38307.84.