• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促使抑郁症患者参与治疗连续性。

Engaging Patients with Depression in Treatment Continuity.

机构信息

SAMRC Unit on Risk & Resilience, Department of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Institute, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Apr;39(Suppl 1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-02029-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-021-02029-6
PMID:35247182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9016040/
Abstract

When conceptualising engagement with treatment, it may be useful to contrast 'disease', which refers to underlying psychobiological dysfunction, with 'illness', which describes the experience of the person with that disease. Knowledge of disease, as well as understanding of illness, including patients' explanatory models of symptoms, may be useful in facilitating shared decision-making. Ideally, physicians are able to integrate evidence-based medicine with values-based medicine by combining the best research evidence with patients' unique needs and preferences. This, in turn, requires taking a systematic approach to the assessment of a range of domains (i.e. symptom profile, clinical subtype, severity and comorbidity) in individuals with depression, and individualising treatment accordingly. While data are now available from a range of randomised clinical trials addressing treatments for depressive symptoms, it is also notable that a decrease in symptom severity does not necessarily correlate with an increase in functioning, which highlights the need to monitor patients for the effect of treatment on a range of outcomes including comorbid anxiety, emotional responsiveness, and sleep quality. Importantly, recent epidemiological data emphasise the importance of persistence with treatment; most patients with major depression who persist with treatment eventually feel helped.

摘要

在考虑与治疗的互动时,将“疾病”(指潜在的心理生物学功能障碍)与“疾病”(描述患有该疾病的人的体验)进行对比可能会有所帮助。了解疾病,以及了解疾病,包括患者对症状的解释模型,可能有助于促进共同决策。理想情况下,医生可以通过将最佳研究证据与患者的独特需求和偏好相结合,将循证医学与价值医学相结合。这反过来又要求对抑郁症患者的一系列领域(即症状谱、临床亚型、严重程度和合并症)进行系统评估,并相应地进行个体化治疗。虽然现在有一系列随机临床试验的数据可用于治疗抑郁症状,但值得注意的是,症状严重程度的降低不一定与功能的提高相关,这突出了需要监测患者治疗对一系列结果的影响,包括合并焦虑、情绪反应和睡眠质量。重要的是,最近的流行病学数据强调了坚持治疗的重要性;大多数坚持治疗的重度抑郁症患者最终都会感到有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/9016040/e3cebcba7913/12325_2021_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/9016040/6f7f463515ba/12325_2021_2029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/9016040/e3cebcba7913/12325_2021_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/9016040/6f7f463515ba/12325_2021_2029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/9016040/e3cebcba7913/12325_2021_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging Patients with Depression in Treatment Continuity.促使抑郁症患者参与治疗连续性。
Adv Ther. 2022 Apr;39(Suppl 1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-02029-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.
3
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
4
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
5
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
6
Predictors of persistence of comorbid generalized anxiety disorder among veterans with major depressive disorder.预测患有重度抑郁症的退伍军人共病广泛性焦虑障碍持续存在的因素。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;72(11):1445-51. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m05981blu. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
7
Letter to the Editor: Depression As The First Symptom Of Frontal Lobe Grade 2 Malignant Glioma.给编辑的信:额颞叶 2 级恶性胶质瘤的首发症状为抑郁。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Summer;33(2):143-145. doi: 10.5080/u25957.
8
The epidemiology of generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍的流行病学
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;24(1):19-39. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70204-5.
9
Fluoxetine treatment of depressed patients with comorbid anxiety disorders.用氟西汀治疗伴有共病焦虑症的抑郁症患者。
J Psychopharmacol. 2002 Sep;16(3):215-9. doi: 10.1177/026988110201600304.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
User-Centered Design of a Preference-Driven Patient Activation Tool for Optimizing Depression Treatment in Integrated Primary Care Settings (The Transform DepCare Study).以患者为中心设计偏好驱动的患者激活工具,用于优化综合初级保健环境中的抑郁症治疗(Transform DepCare研究)
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):556-568. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08833-4. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
2
Experiences of treatment-resistant mental health conditions in primary care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.初级保健中治疗抵抗性精神健康状况的体验:系统评价和主题综合。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 16;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01819-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management.针对成年抑郁症患者的临床特征进行个性化管理。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):269-293. doi: 10.1002/wps.20771.
2
A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression.心理治疗、药物治疗及其联合应用对成人抑郁症治疗效果的网状Meta分析。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):92-107. doi: 10.1002/wps.20701.
3
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development.
柳叶刀全球精神卫生与可持续发展委员会
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Efficacy of antidepressants on measures of workplace functioning in major depressive disorder: A systematic review.抗抑郁药对重性抑郁障碍患者职场功能测量指标的疗效:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Efficacy of agomelatine and escitalopram on depression, subjective sleep and emotional experiences in patients with major depressive disorder: a 24-wk randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.阿戈美拉汀与艾司西酞普兰治疗重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效:一项 24 周随机、对照、双盲试验。比较阿戈美拉汀与艾司西酞普兰治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效及安全性。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;16(10):2219-34. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713000679. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Efficacy of the novel antidepressant agomelatine for anxiety symptoms in major depression.新型抗抑郁药阿戈美拉汀治疗重度抑郁症焦虑症状的疗效
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;28(2):151-9. doi: 10.1002/hup.2294.
8
The value of evidence and evidence of values: bringing together values-based and evidence-based practice in policy and service development in mental health.证据的价值与价值的证据:将基于价值和基于证据的实践融入心理健康政策与服务发展之中。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):976-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01732.x.
9
World Psychiatric Association perspectives on person-centered psychiatry and medicine.世界精神病学协会对以人为本的精神病学和医学的看法。
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Jan 29;10 Suppl(Suppl):e003. doi: 10.5334/ijic.473.
10
Anxious depression: clinical features and treatment.焦虑性抑郁症:临床特征与治疗。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009 Dec;11(6):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s11920-009-0065-2.