Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
Work-related disability and productivity loss in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are critical determinants of patient quality of life and contribute significantly to the human and economic costs of MDD. Notwithstanding the return to work and pre-morbid levels of functioning as a critical therapeutic objective among individuals with MDD, it is unclear whether antidepressant treatment significantly and reliably improves measures of workplace functioning. Herein, we investigate to what extent antidepressant treatment improves workplace functioning among adults with MDD.
We conducted a systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled or active comparator clinical trials primarily or secondarily investigating the efficacy of antidepressant agents on subjective ratings of workplace functioning and/or measures of work absence.
Thirteen placebo-controlled and four active comparator clinical trials reported on the efficacy of agomelatine, bupropion, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, levomilnacipran, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, or vortioxetine on subjective measures of workplace impairment. Overall, antidepressant treatment improved standardized measures of workplace functioning (e.g., Sheehan Disability Scale-work item). One placebo-controlled trial of agomelatine and one clinical trial comparing the efficacy of vortioxetine to that of venlafaxine had mixed results on measures of work absence.
Included interventional trials evaluated work-related disability as a secondary outcome using subjective rating scales.
Extant data suggest that antidepressant treatment improves workplace outcomes in MDD. The capability of antidepressants in improving measures of workplace functioning should be considered in cost-benefit analyses to better inform cost-modelling studies pertaining to antidepressant therapy.
工作相关的残疾和生产效率损失是重度抑郁症(MDD)患者生活质量的关键决定因素,也是 MDD 患者的人力和经济成本的重要组成部分。尽管恢复工作和达到患病前的功能水平是 MDD 患者的一个重要治疗目标,但抗抑郁治疗是否能显著且可靠地改善工作场所功能的衡量标准仍不清楚。在此,我们研究了抗抑郁治疗在多大程度上改善了 MDD 成年患者的工作场所功能。
我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,纳入了主要或次要调查抗抑郁药物对工作场所功能的主观评估和/或工作缺勤衡量标准疗效的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照或活性对照临床试验。
13 项安慰剂对照和 4 项活性对照临床试验报告了阿戈美拉汀、安非他酮、去甲文拉法辛、度洛西汀、氟西汀、左旋米那普仑、帕罗西汀、舍曲林、文拉法辛或沃替西汀对工作场所受损的主观衡量标准的疗效。总体而言,抗抑郁治疗改善了工作场所功能的标准化衡量标准(例如,Sheehan 残疾量表-工作项目)。一项阿戈美拉汀的安慰剂对照试验和一项比较沃替西汀与文拉法辛疗效的临床试验在工作缺勤衡量标准上结果不一致。
纳入的干预性试验使用主观评分量表将与工作相关的残疾作为次要结果进行评估。
现有数据表明,抗抑郁治疗可改善 MDD 的工作场所结局。在成本效益分析中应考虑抗抑郁药物改善工作场所功能衡量标准的能力,以便更好地为抗抑郁治疗的成本建模研究提供信息。