• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常用于治疗痴呆相关精神病的非典型抗精神病药物的疗效比较:网状荟萃分析。

Comparative Outcomes of Commonly Used Off-Label Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Dementia-Related Psychosis: A Network Meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):1993-2008. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02075-8. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-022-02075-8
PMID:35247186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9056477/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dementia-related psychosis (DRP) is characterized by hallucinations and delusions, which may increase the debilitating effects of underlying dementia. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) commonly used off label to treat DRP.

METHODS

We included 22 eligible studies from a systematic literature review of AAPs (quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and brexpiprazole) used off label to treat DRP. Study outcomes were: (1) efficacy-neuropsychiatric inventory-nursing home (NPI-NH psychosis subscale), (2) safety-mortality, cerebrovascular events (CVAEs), and others (somnolence, falls, fractures, injuries, etc.), and (3) acceptability-discontinuations due to all causes, lack of efficacy, and adverse events (AEs). We used random-effects modeling to estimate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for NPI-NH psychosis subscale scores and odds ratios (OR) for other dichotomous outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, aripiprazole (SMD - 0.12; 95% CI - 0.31, 0.06), and olanzapine (SMD - 0.17; 95% CI - 0.04; 0.02) demonstrated small, non-significant numerical improvements in NPI-NH psychosis scores (5 studies; n = 1891), while quetiapine (SMD 0.04; 95% CI - 0.23, 0.32) did not improve symptoms. The odds of mortality (15 studies, n = 4989) were higher for aripiprazole (OR 1.58; 95% CI 0.62, 4.04), brexpiprazole (OR 2.22; 95% CI 0.30, 16.56), olanzapine (OR 2.21; 95% CI 0.84, 5.85), quetiapine (OR 1.68; 95% CI 0.70, 4.03), and risperidone (OR 1.63; 95% CI 0.93, 2.85) than for placebo. Risperidone (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.68, 8.95) and olanzapine (OR 4.47; 95% CI 1.36, 14.69) demonstrated significantly greater odds of CVAEs compared to placebo. Compared with placebo, odds of all-cause discontinuation were significantly lower for aripiprazole (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51, 0.98; 20 studies; 5744 patients) and higher for other AAPs. Aripiprazole (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.31, 0.82) and olanzapine (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31, 0.74) had significantly lower odds of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy (OR 12 studies; n = 4382) compared to placebo, while results for quetiapine and risperidone were not significant. Compared with placebo, the odds of discontinuation due to AEs (19 studies, n = 5445) were higher for olanzapine (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.75, 3.92), brexpiprazole (OR 1.80; 95% CI 0.80, 4.07), quetiapine (OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.82, 1.91), aripiprazole (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.90, 2.13), and risperidone (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.02, 1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall results demonstrate that, compared with placebo, quetiapine is not associated with improvement in psychosis in patients with dementia, while olanzapine and aripiprazole have non-significant small numerical improvements. These off-label AAPs (quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and brexpiprazole) are associated with greater odds of mortality, CVAEs, and discontinuations due to AEs than placebo. These results underscore the ongoing unmet need for newer pharmacological options with a more favorable benefit-risk profile for the treatment of DRP.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/0de77bccac12/12325_2022_2075_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/88f69ea48a62/12325_2022_2075_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/23cd29921a34/12325_2022_2075_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/65d7eaf0678a/12325_2022_2075_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/0de77bccac12/12325_2022_2075_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/88f69ea48a62/12325_2022_2075_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/23cd29921a34/12325_2022_2075_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/65d7eaf0678a/12325_2022_2075_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/9056477/0de77bccac12/12325_2022_2075_Fig4_HTML.jpg
摘要

简介

痴呆相关精神病(DRP)的特征是幻觉和妄想,这可能会加重潜在痴呆症的致残影响。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估了通常被标签外用于治疗 DRP 的几种非典型抗精神病药(AAP)的疗效、安全性和可接受性。

方法

我们从 AAP(喹硫平、利培酮、奥氮平、阿立哌唑和布瑞哌唑)治疗 DRP 的系统文献综述中纳入了 22 项合格研究。研究结果为:(1)疗效-神经精神病学入院护理院(NPI-NH 精神病亚量表),(2)安全性-死亡率、脑血管事件(CVAEs)和其他(嗜睡、跌倒、骨折、损伤等),以及(3)可接受性-因所有原因、缺乏疗效和不良事件(AE)而停药。我们使用随机效应模型估计 NPI-NH 精神病亚量表评分的标准化均数差(SMD)和其他二分类结局的比值比(OR),并分别给出其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

与安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑(SMD -0.12;95%CI -0.31,0.06)和奥氮平(SMD -0.17;95%CI -0.04;0.02)在 NPI-NH 精神病评分方面有较小但无统计学意义的数值改善(5 项研究;n=1891),而喹硫平(SMD 0.04;95%CI -0.23,0.32)并未改善症状。阿立哌唑(OR 1.58;95%CI 0.62,4.04)、布瑞哌唑(OR 2.22;95%CI 0.30,16.56)、奥氮平(OR 2.21;95%CI 0.84,5.85)、喹硫平(OR 1.68;95%CI 0.70,4.03)和利培酮(OR 1.63;95%CI 0.93,2.85)的死亡率高于安慰剂。利培酮(OR 3.68;95%CI 1.68,8.95)和奥氮平(OR 4.47;95%CI 1.36,14.69)发生 CVAEs 的几率明显高于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑(OR 0.71;95%CI 0.51,0.98;20 项研究;5744 例患者)和其他 AAP 的全因停药几率较低,而其他 AAP 的停药几率较高。阿立哌唑(OR 0.5;95%CI 0.31,0.82)和奥氮平(OR 0.48;95%CI 0.31,0.74)因缺乏疗效而停药的几率明显低于安慰剂(OR 12 项研究;n=4382),而喹硫平和利培酮的结果则不显著。与安慰剂相比,奥氮平(OR 2.62;95%CI 1.75,3.92)、布瑞哌唑(OR 1.80;95%CI 0.80,4.07)、喹硫平(OR 1.25;95%CI 0.82,1.91)、阿立哌唑(OR 1.38;95%CI 0.90,2.13)和利培酮(OR 1.41;95%CI 1.02,1.94)因 AE 而停药的几率较高。

结论

总体结果表明,与安慰剂相比,喹硫平与痴呆患者的精神病改善无关,而奥氮平和阿立哌唑则有较小但无统计学意义的数值改善。这些标签外的 AAP(喹硫平、利培酮、奥氮平、阿立哌唑和布瑞哌唑)与安慰剂相比,死亡率、CVAEs 和因 AE 而停药的几率更高。这些结果强调了对治疗 DRP 的新型药理学选择的持续需求,这种选择具有更有利的风险效益比。

相似文献

1
Comparative Outcomes of Commonly Used Off-Label Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Dementia-Related Psychosis: A Network Meta-analysis.常用于治疗痴呆相关精神病的非典型抗精神病药物的疗效比较:网状荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):1993-2008. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02075-8. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Summary of the comparative effectiveness review on off-label use of atypical antipsychotics.非典型抗精神病药物超说明书使用的比较有效性评价综述
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5 Suppl B):S1-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.S5-B.1.
3
Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.奥氮平与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006654.pub2.
4
Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.第二代抗精神病药治疗痴呆患者行为和心理症状的疗效、可接受性和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jul 30;27(1):e301019. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301019.
5
Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.利培酮与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD006626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006626.pub2.
6
The effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of aggression and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease.非典型抗精神病药物治疗阿尔茨海默病攻击行为和精神病的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD003476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003476.pub2.
7
Antipsychotics for agitation and psychosis in people with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.抗精神病药治疗阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆患者的激越和精神病性症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 17;12(12):CD013304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013304.pub2.
8
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.
9
Clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.氯氮平与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD006633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006633.pub2.
10
Risperidone (depot) for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的长效利培酮
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 14;4(4):CD004161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004161.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for a usability and pilot implementation study of a digital medical device to assess pain in non-verbal people with dementia in Portuguese residential care facilities.一项关于数字医疗设备可用性和试点实施研究的方案,该设备用于评估葡萄牙养老院中患有痴呆症的非言语患者的疼痛。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076241311326. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311326. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of psychiatric and behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.奥氮平和利培酮治疗阿尔茨海默病精神和行为症状的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e35663. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035663.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Managing the Burden of Dementia Related Delusions and Hallucinations.应对与痴呆症相关的妄想和幻觉负担
J Fam Pract. 2020 Sep;69(7 Suppl):S39-S44.
2
Safety of pharmacologic interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.痴呆患者神经精神症状的药物干预安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01607-7.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Brexpiprazole for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer's Dementia: Two 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Successful Use of High-Dose Brexpiprazole for Psychosis in Lewy Body Dementia without Adverse Effects.高剂量布瑞哌唑成功用于路易体痴呆伴精神病且无不良反应
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Mar 1;34(1):99-101. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2024.23772. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome: a comparative bibliometric analysis.神经阻滞剂恶性综合征和血清素综合征:一项比较文献计量分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Jun 2;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03227-5.
5
Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在阿尔茨海默病患者中,使用布瑞哌唑治疗激越的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Oct;45(10):4679-4686. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07576-8. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
The treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia: pragmatic recommendations.痴呆行为和心理症状的治疗:实用建议。
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 Jul;24(4):968-982. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13116. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Off-label use of artificial intelligence models in healthcare.人工智能模型在医疗保健中的超说明书使用。
Nat Med. 2024 Jun;30(6):1525-1527. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02870-6.
8
Psychotic Symptoms in Patients With Major Neurological Diseases.患有主要神经系统疾病患者的精神病症状
J Clin Neurol. 2024 Mar;20(2):153-165. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0501.
9
Behavioral or neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: from psychopathology to pharmacological management.阿尔茨海默病的行为或神经精神症状:从精神病理学到药物治疗管理。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 Dec;81(12):1152-1162. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777774. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
10
Risk of long-term care admissions among Medicare beneficiaries treated with pimavanserin or quetiapine for Parkinson's disease psychosis in USA: a retrospective administrative claims database analysis.美国接受 pimavanserin 或喹硫平治疗帕金森病精神病的 Medicare 受益人的长期护理入院风险:一项回顾性行政索赔数据库分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Jan;13(1):e230114. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0114. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
Brexpiprazole 治疗阿尔茨海默病激越的疗效和安全性:两项为期 12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):383-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Assessment of Reported Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Network Meta-analysis.评估非典型抗精神病药治疗痴呆行为和心理症状的报告比较有效性和安全性:网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190828. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0828.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of therapy for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.治疗痴呆患者行为和心理症状的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2019 Oct;266(10):2363-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09200-8. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
Is providing uncertainty intervals in treatment ranking helpful in a network meta-analysis?在网络荟萃分析中提供治疗排序的不确定性区间是否有帮助?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
7
The Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Long-term Care, Nursing Home Admission, and Death in Dementia Patients.抗精神病药物对痴呆患者长期护理、入住养老院和死亡的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Sep 11;73(10):1396-1402. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx239.
8
Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata.网络荟萃分析:Stata 应用与实践
Epidemiol Health. 2017 Oct 27;39:e2017047. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017047. eCollection 2017.
9
Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples.多结局与多治疗方法的多变量及网状荟萃分析:原理、概念及实例
BMJ. 2017 Sep 13;358:j3932. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3932.
10
Antipsychotic use in dementia: a systematic review of benefits and risks from meta-analyses.痴呆症中抗精神病药物的使用:来自荟萃分析的益处和风险的系统评价
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2016 Sep;7(5):229-45. doi: 10.1177/2040622316658463. Epub 2016 Jul 15.