Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology Research, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, ,Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Epidemiol Health. 2017 Oct 27;39:e2017047. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017047. eCollection 2017.
This review aimed to arrange the concepts of a network meta-analysis (NMA) and to demonstrate the analytical process of NMA using Stata software under frequentist framework. The NMA tries to synthesize evidences for a decision making by evaluating the comparative effectiveness of more than two alternative interventions for the same condition. Before conducting a NMA, 3 major assumptions-similarity, transitivity, and consistency-should be checked. The statistical analysis consists of 5 steps. The first step is to draw a network geometry to provide an overview of the network relationship. The second step checks the assumption of consistency. The third step is to make the network forest plot or interval plot in order to illustrate the summary size of comparative effectiveness among various interventions. The fourth step calculates cumulative rankings for identifying superiority among interventions. The last step evaluates publication bias or effect modifiers for a valid inference from results. The synthesized evidences through five steps would be very useful to evidence-based decision-making in healthcare. Thus, NMA should be activated in order to guarantee the quality of healthcare system.
本综述旨在整理网络荟萃分析(NMA)的概念,并使用 Stata 软件在频率论框架下展示 NMA 的分析过程。NMA 通过评估同一情况下两种以上干预措施的相对有效性,尝试综合证据以进行决策。在进行 NMA 之前,应检查三个主要假设——相似性、传递性和一致性。统计分析包括五个步骤。第一步是绘制网络几何图形,以提供网络关系的概述。第二步检查一致性假设。第三步是制作网络森林图或区间图,以说明各种干预措施之间相对有效性的总结大小。第四步计算累积排名,以确定干预措施之间的优势。最后一步评估发表偏倚或效应修饰符,以从结果中得出有效推断。通过这五个步骤综合的证据对医疗保健中的循证决策非常有用。因此,为了保证医疗保健系统的质量,应该激活 NMA。