Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):1929-1937. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06463-x. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
Biologic agents have revolutionized treatment of immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). However, despite the benefits of treatment, there is limited data on its use during pregnancy leading to significant variation in practices. We evaluated maternal, neonatal, and disease-related outcomes in pregnant women with IMIDs, comparing those with biologic exposure during pregnancy to those without exposure. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in outcomes between the two groups.
This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care center including women with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (PS/PsA) who delivered between 2010 and 2018 at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Conditions were identified by ICD-9/ICD-10 code and confirmed by chart review. Demographic data, pregnancy outcomes and disease-related data were collected.
There were 338 pregnancies including 100 with CD, 74 with UC, 15 with AS, 61 with RA, and 90 with PS/PsA. 23% of IMID patients had biologic exposure (biologic use within 3 months of conception) and 18% continued therapy during pregnancy. Those with biologic exposure had increased risk of post-partum disease flare (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.29, 9.15) and were less likely to breastfeed (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23, 0.87). In subgroup analysis of patients with IBD, those with biologic exposure also had increased risk of post-partum flare (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.27, 16.35). Maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes were similar.
Among pregnant women with IMIDs, those that continued biologics during pregnancy had increased rates of major infection, disease related hospital admission, glucocorticoid use, and disease flare within 6 months post-partum, without any significant change in maternal or neonatal outcomes.
生物制剂彻底改变了免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)的治疗方法。然而,尽管治疗有其益处,但关于其在怀孕期间使用的数据有限,导致实践存在显著差异。我们评估了患有 IMIDs 的孕妇的母婴、新生儿和疾病相关结局,并比较了在怀孕期间接受生物制剂治疗和未接受治疗的孕妇。我们的假设是两组之间的结果没有差异。
这是一项在俄亥俄州立大学韦克斯纳医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2018 年间在该中心分娩的克罗恩病(CD)、溃疡性结肠炎(UC)、强直性脊柱炎(AS)、类风湿关节炎(RA)或银屑病/银屑病关节炎(PS/PsA)的女性。通过 ICD-9/ICD-10 代码识别疾病,并通过病历回顾进行确认。收集人口统计学数据、妊娠结局和疾病相关数据。
共 338 例妊娠,其中 100 例 CD、74 例 UC、15 例 AS、61 例 RA 和 90 例 PS/PsA。23%的 IMID 患者接受过生物制剂治疗(受孕前 3 个月内使用生物制剂),18%在怀孕期间继续治疗。有生物制剂治疗史的患者产后疾病发作风险增加(OR 3.44;95%CI 1.29,9.15),母乳喂养的可能性降低(OR 0.44;95%CI 0.23,0.87)。在 IBD 患者的亚组分析中,有生物制剂治疗史的患者产后发作风险也增加(OR 4.55;95%CI 1.27,16.35)。母婴妊娠结局相似。
在患有 IMIDs 的孕妇中,那些在怀孕期间继续使用生物制剂的患者在产后 6 个月内发生重大感染、疾病相关住院、使用糖皮质激素和疾病发作的风险增加,而母婴结局没有任何显著变化。