Ballesteros Ruiz Cristina, Bandini Marco, Joshi Pankaj M, Bafna Sandeep, Sharma Vipin, Yatam Shreeranga L, Bhadranavar Shreyas, Patil Amey, Kulkarni Sanjay B
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 May;54(5):1039-1045. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03158-9. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
Non-traumatic obliterative bulbar urethral stricture with residual urethral lumen below 3 Fr is a challenging surgical scenario for reconstructive surgeons, because either anastomotic or single augmentation urethroplasty is not an option.
To describe our double-face buccal mucosa graft (BMG) urethroplasty with dorsal onlay and ventral inlay relying on the vessels and nerve-sparing technique of Kulkarni's one-side dissection.
We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients with non-traumatic obliterative bulbar urethral strictures who underwent double-face bulbar urethroplasty with one-side dissection and dorsal onlay plus ventral inlay BMG. Patient demographics, clinical data, and follow-up were analyzed.
A total of 59 patients underwent double-face urethroplasty with dorsal approach. The median age was 37 years (IQR 27-49) and the median stricture length was 5 cm (IQR 3.75-6). No patients had immediate post-operative complications. The overall success rate was 88% with a median follow-up of 30.9 months (IQR 16.9-44.2). Two patients were treated with DVIU, and two patients with open urethral surgery. One patient developed erectile dysfunction after surgery. Age, etiology, stenosis length and previous treatment were not factors related to surgical failure.
Our preliminary albeit encouraging results showed that this approach was feasible in all patients and with negligible perioperative complications. Success rate was 88%. We did not find any factors related to surgical failure. Our dorsal double-face augmented urethroplasty may be a valid alternative to the Palminteri's ventral double-face urethroplasty, especially in those patients with mid-distal bulbar or peno-bulbar urethral strictures.
对于重建外科医生而言,非创伤性球部尿道闭锁性狭窄且残余尿道腔直径小于3F是一种具有挑战性的手术情况,因为吻合术或单纯的尿道扩大成形术都不可行。
描述我们采用双面颊黏膜移植(BMG)尿道成形术,即背侧覆盖加腹侧嵌入,并依赖库尔卡尼单侧解剖的血管和神经保留技术。
我们回顾性分析了一个前瞻性维护的数据库,该数据库包含接受单侧解剖及背侧覆盖加腹侧嵌入BMG的非创伤性球部尿道狭窄患者。分析了患者的人口统计学数据、临床资料及随访情况。
共有59例患者接受了经背侧入路的双面尿道成形术。中位年龄为37岁(四分位间距27 - 49岁),中位狭窄长度为5cm(四分位间距3.75 - 6cm)。术后无患者出现即刻并发症。中位随访30.9个月(四分位间距16.9 - 44.2个月),总体成功率为88%。2例患者接受了经尿道内切开术(DVIU)治疗,2例患者接受了开放性尿道手术。1例患者术后出现勃起功能障碍。年龄、病因、狭窄长度及既往治疗情况均不是与手术失败相关的因素。
我们初步的、尽管令人鼓舞的结果表明,这种方法对所有患者均可行,围手术期并发症可忽略不计。成功率为88%。我们未发现任何与手术失败相关的因素。我们的背侧双面扩大尿道成形术可能是帕尔明泰里腹侧双面尿道成形术的一种有效替代方法,尤其适用于那些患有中远端球部或阴茎 - 球部尿道狭窄的患者。