Institute of Diabetes, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University and The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 May;46(3):476-485. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0074. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio is recently suggested to be a surrogate marker for sarcopenia. However, little is known about its association with diabetes. This study aimed to fill in this gap based on a large-scale prospective cohort.
A population-based representative sample of 5,055 participants aged ≥45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study was enrolled between 2011 and 2012 and followed at least once during the subsequent surveys at 2013, 2015, or 2018. Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio was calculated and normalized by body weight. Incident diabetes was ascertained by plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, self-reported history, or use of anti-diabetic drugs. Logistic regression analysis and mediation analysis were employed.
During follow-up, 634 participants developed diabetes. The risk of diabetes was gradually and significantly decreased with increased normalized creatinine-cystatin C ratio. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for diabetes was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.99) per 1 standard deviation higher of normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio, and this relationship remained significant after controlling for muscle strength. The risk reduction in diabetes was significantly larger in participants with normal-weight and high normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio compared with those with overweight/obesity and high normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (Pinteraction=0.01). Insulin resistance and inflammation appeared to be key mediators accounting for the observed relationship between normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and risk of diabetes, with their mediating effect being 93.1% and 22.0%, respectively.
High normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio is associated with reduced risk of diabetes in middle-aged and older adults.
肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值最近被提议作为肌少症的替代标志物。然而,关于其与糖尿病的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在基于大规模前瞻性队列填补这一空白。
本研究纳入了 2011 年至 2012 年期间参加中国健康与退休纵向研究的年龄≥45 岁的具有代表性的人群样本,共 5055 名参与者,并在随后的 2013 年、2015 年或 2018 年的调查中至少随访一次。计算并按体重标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值。通过血浆葡萄糖、糖化血红蛋白、自我报告病史或使用抗糖尿病药物来确定糖尿病的发生。采用 logistic 回归分析和中介分析。
随访期间,有 634 名参与者发生了糖尿病。随着标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值的增加,糖尿病的风险逐渐显著降低。标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值每增加 1 个标准差,糖尿病的多变量调整比值比为 0.91(95%置信区间,0.83 至 0.99),且在控制肌肉力量后该关系仍然显著。与超重/肥胖和高标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值的参与者相比,正常体重和高标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值的参与者的糖尿病风险降低幅度明显更大(P 交互=0.01)。胰岛素抵抗和炎症似乎是解释标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值与糖尿病风险之间关系的关键中介因素,其中介效应分别为 93.1%和 22.0%。
在中年和老年人中,高标准化肌氨酸酐-胱抑素 C 比值与降低糖尿病风险相关。