Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, School of Education, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Health and Social Research Center, Cuenca, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 May;23(5):818-828. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2049884. Epub 2022 May 2.
: Examine the validity and reliability of parent-reported International FItness Scale (IFIS) in preschoolers. : A cross-sectional study of 3051 Spanish preschoolers (3-5 years). Fitness was measured by PREFIT battery and reported by parents using an adapted version of the IFIS. Waist circumference was evaluated, and the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was calculated. Seventy-six parents of randomly selected schoolchildren completed the IFIS twice for a reliability assessment. : ANCOVA, adjusted for sex, age and WHtR, showed that preschoolers who were scored by their parents as having average-to-very good fitness had better levels of measured physical fitness than those preschoolers who were classified as having "very poor/poor" fitness levels (18.1laps to 22.1laps vs 15.6laps for cardiorespiratory fitness; 6.6 kg to 7.5 kg vs 5.3 kg for muscular fitness-handgrip-; 71.7 cm to 76.4 cm vs 62.0 cm for muscular fitness-standing long jump-; 17.2s to 16.2s vs 18.2s for speed/agility; and 11.2s to 15.6s vs 8.7s for balance; < 0.001). The weighted kappa for concordance between parent-reported fitness levels and objective assessment was poor (κ ≤ 0.18 for all fitness measures). Overall, the mean values of the abdominal adiposity indicators were significantly lower in high-level fitness categories reported by parents than in low-level fitness categories ( < 0.05). The test-retest reliability ranged from 0.46 to 0.62. : The reliability of the parent-reported IFIS are acceptable, but the concordance between parents reported and objectively measures fitness levels is poor, suggesting that parents' responses may not be able to correctly classify preschoolers according to their fitness level.The convergent validity and reliability (test-retest) values of the IFIS parent scale are moderately acceptable for assessing physical fitness in children aged 3-5 years.However, the results of concordance show that criterion validity is poor suggesting that parents' responses may not be able to correctly classify preschoolers according to their fitness level.Considering that the fitness level at these ages is fairly homogeneous, it seems difficult for parents to discriminate between the fitness levels of their children. Therefore, it seems necessary to recalibrate the scale in future work.
: 检验家长报告的国际体力活动量表(IFIS)在学龄前儿童中的有效性和可靠性。 : 这是一项对 3051 名西班牙学龄前儿童(3-5 岁)的横断面研究。通过 PREFIT 电池测量体力,并由家长使用 IFIS 的改编版进行报告。评估了腰围,计算了腰高比(WHtR)。随机选择的 76 名学童的家长为可靠性评估完成了两次 IFIS 测试。 : 协方差分析(ANCOVA),调整性别、年龄和 WHtR 后,发现家长报告的平均至非常好的体力的学龄前儿童的测量体力水平优于被归类为“非常差/差”的体力水平的学龄前儿童(心肺适能为 18.1 至 22.1 圈;握力为 6.6 至 7.5 公斤;站立跳远为 71.7 至 76.4 厘米;速度/敏捷性为 17.2 至 16.2 秒;平衡为 11.2 至 15.6 秒; < 0.001)。家长报告的体力水平与客观评估之间的一致性加权 kapp 值较差(所有体力测量的 κ 值均≤0.18)。总体而言,家长报告的高水平体力类别中的腹部肥胖指标平均值明显低于低水平体力类别( < 0.05)。测试 - 重测可靠性范围为 0.46 至 0.62。 : 家长报告的 IFIS 的可靠性是可以接受的,但家长报告的与客观测量的体力水平之间的一致性较差,表明家长的反应可能无法根据孩子的体力水平正确分类学龄前儿童。IFIS 家长量表的会聚效度和可靠性(测试 - 重测)对于评估 3-5 岁儿童的体力适度可接受。然而,一致性结果表明,效标效度较差,表明家长的反应可能无法根据孩子的体力水平正确分类学龄前儿童。考虑到这些年龄的体力水平相当均匀,家长似乎难以区分孩子的体力水平。因此,在未来的工作中似乎需要重新校准量表。