Tanha Moutushi, Michelson Grant, Chowdhury Mesbahuddin, Castka Pavel
Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, UC Business School, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Department of Management, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
J Safety Res. 2022 Feb;80:14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
The dismantling of large ocean-going ships at the end of their productive use, or shipbreaking, has a poor reputation for employee safety in some developing countries. India and Bangladesh have recently come to dominate the global shipbreaking industry in terms of the tonnage of scrapped and recycled ships and the work is reportedly hazardous, posing significant ethical and practical risks to employee health and safety. This study aims to investigate the veracity of this reputation by identifying how different shipbreaking firms manage workplace safety, and their reasons for doing so.
Drawing on in-depth case-based research at three shipbreaking firms in Chittagong, Bangladesh, data were collected from governmental representatives, industry experts, and NGO's through interviews, site observations, and industry reports. Safety performance data (number of injuries and fatalities) were collected between 2014 and 2019 and verified from different sources.
In contrast to uniformly poor outcomes, the findings show better but uneven practices of workplace safety among the three shipbreaking firms, a phenomenon that we describe as 'varieties of employee safety.' The better performing shipbreaking firms on safety outcomes had higher managerial commitment towards improving safety, provided personal protective equipment (PPE) and training, adopted formal management systems such as external certification, and had more robust management processes concerning workplace safety in place.
Management agency or choices towards strengthening workplace safety can positively influence safety performance outcomes in Bangladesh shipbreaking firms. We also contend that there is a close relationship between management ethics and occupational risk management in the workplace. This is a relatively novel perspective for health and safety research. Practical applications: Our empirical insights challenge common assumptions that safety practices in the shipbreaking industry in developing nations like Bangladesh are homogenous and consistently of low standard. This provides policymakers, the media, and safety practitioners with the opportunity to showcase best practices, whilst also identifying how safety in shipbreaking can be further improved for firms that are poor in their safety performance.
大型远洋船舶在其使用寿命结束时进行拆解,即拆船,在一些发展中国家,拆船业因员工安全问题而声名狼藉。就报废和回收船舶的吨位而言,印度和孟加拉国最近在全球拆船业占据主导地位,而且据报道这项工作危险重重,给员工的健康和安全带来了重大的伦理和实际风险。本研究旨在通过确定不同的拆船公司如何管理工作场所安全及其这样做的原因,来调查这种声誉的真实性。
基于对孟加拉国吉大港三家拆船公司的深入案例研究,通过访谈、实地观察和行业报告,从政府代表、行业专家和非政府组织收集数据。收集了2014年至2019年期间的安全绩效数据(受伤和死亡人数),并从不同来源进行了核实。
与普遍较差的结果形成对比的是,研究结果显示这三家拆船公司在工作场所安全方面的做法较好但不均衡,我们将这种现象描述为“员工安全的多样性”。在安全结果方面表现较好的拆船公司对改善安全有更高的管理承诺,提供个人防护设备(PPE)和培训,采用外部认证等正式管理系统,并且有更健全的工作场所安全管理流程。
管理机构对加强工作场所安全的选择或决策可以对孟加拉国拆船公司的安全绩效结果产生积极影响。我们还认为,管理伦理与工作场所的职业风险管理之间存在密切关系。这对于健康与安全研究来说是一个相对新颖的观点。实际应用:我们的实证见解挑战了常见的假设,即像孟加拉国这样的发展中国家拆船业的安全做法是同质化的,而且一直处于低标准。这为政策制定者、媒体和安全从业者提供了展示最佳实践的机会,同时也确定了安全绩效较差的公司如何进一步改善拆船安全。