Suppr超能文献

他们需要接受检测才能被震慑住吗?探索接触路边药物检测对药物驾驶的影响。

Do they need to be tested to be deterred? Exploring the impact of exposure to roadside drug testing on drug driving.

作者信息

Mills Laura, Freeman James, Parkes Alexander, Davey Jeremy

机构信息

Road Safety Research Collaboration, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia.

Road Safety Research Collaboration, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2022 Feb;80:362-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.017. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maximizing the deterrent effects of Roadside Drug Testing (RDT) operations remains critical for improving road safety. While preliminary research has explored the impact of being tested at RDT sites, there is yet to be an investigation of different types of exposure (e.g., seeing an operation, being tested) and the subsequent relationship(s) with perceptions of certainty of apprehension and future intentions to offend. The overall objective of this research was to explore these relationships with a sample of drug takers.

METHOD

A total of 803 Queensland motorists aged between 16 and 75 (M = 27.12, SD = 13.09) completed an online-based survey, and all reported consuming marijuana, MDMA, and/or methamphetamine at least once in the previous 12 months. A convenience sampling method was utilized (via Facebook).

RESULTS

The drug driving proportion of the sample (58%) reported a total of 30,858 instances of drug driving, or 66 instances on average. Seeing RDT in the previous 12 months (26% of sample) was more common than being tested at RDT (7%). The results indicated that seeing RDT two or more times was related to increased certainty of apprehension (compared to those who had seen it only once or never), although the increase was relatively small. Correlational analyses suggest there were some positive (albeit weak relationships) between exposure to RDT (seen and tested) and past and future offending. However, only three significant predictors of future offending emerged: older age, lower perceptions of apprehension certainty, and greater use of marijuana. Practical Applications: The results illuminate the extent of the drug driving problem and the need for greater resourcing to increase the real threat of detection. While the effect of exposure to enforcement was small, it was positive, incremental and supportive of increased roadside police enforcement as well as further research to quantify such deterrent processes.

摘要

引言

最大限度地发挥路边药物检测(RDT)行动的威慑作用对于提高道路安全仍然至关重要。虽然初步研究已经探讨了在RDT地点接受检测的影响,但尚未对不同类型的接触(例如,看到检测行动、接受检测)以及随后与被逮捕确定性的认知和未来犯罪意图之间的关系进行调查。本研究的总体目标是与吸毒者样本探讨这些关系。

方法

共有803名年龄在16至75岁之间(M = 27.12,标准差 = 13.09)的昆士兰驾车者完成了一项在线调查,所有人都报告在过去12个月中至少吸食过一次大麻、摇头丸和/或甲基苯丙胺。采用了便利抽样方法(通过脸书)。

结果

样本中的药物驾驶比例(58%)报告了总共30858次药物驾驶事件,平均为66次。在过去12个月中看到RDT(占样本的26%)比在RDT接受检测(7%)更为常见。结果表明,看到RDT两次或更多次与被逮捕确定性的增加有关(与只看过一次或从未看过的人相比),尽管增加幅度相对较小。相关分析表明,接触RDT(看到和接受检测)与过去和未来的犯罪之间存在一些积极(尽管较弱)的关系。然而,未来犯罪的仅出现了三个显著预测因素:年龄较大、对被逮捕确定性的认知较低以及大麻使用量较大。实际应用:结果揭示了药物驾驶问题的程度以及需要增加资源以提高被发现的实际威胁。虽然接触执法的效果很小,但它是积极的、渐进的,支持增加路边警察执法以及进一步研究以量化这种威慑过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验