Basso Laura, Boecking Benjamin, Neff Patrick, Brueggemann Petra, Mazurek Birgit, Peters Eva M J
Tinnitus Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 18;13:764368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.764368. eCollection 2022.
Currently, there are no objective markers to measure treatment efficacy in chronic (distressing) tinnitus. This study explores whether stress-related biomarkers cortisol and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) measured in hair samples of chronic tinnitus patients change after compact multimodal tinnitus-specific cognitive behavioral therapy.
In this longitudinal study, hair-cortisol and hair-BDNF levels, self-reported tinnitus-related distress (Tinnitus Questionnaire; TQ), and perceived stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire; PSQ-20) were assessed before and 3 months after 5 days of treatment in = 80 chronic tinnitus patients. Linear mixed-effects models with backward elimination were used to assess treatment-induced changes, and a cross-lagged panel model (structural equation model) was used for additional exploratory analysis of the temporal associations between TQ and hair-BDNF.
At follow-up, a reduction in TQ ( < 0.001) and PSQ-20 scores ( = 0.045) was observed, which was not influenced by baseline hair-cortisol or hair-BDNF levels. No changes in biomarker levels were observed after treatment. The exploratory analysis tentatively suggests that a directional effect of baseline TQ scores on hair-BDNF levels at follow-up (trend; = 0.070) was more likely than the opposite directional effect of baseline hair-BDNF levels on TQ scores at follow-up (n.s.).
While the treatment effectively reduced tinnitus-related distress and perceived stress in chronic tinnitus patients, this effect was not mirrored in biological changes. However, the lack of changes in hair-cortisol and hair-BDNF levels might have been influenced by the treatment duration, follow-up interval, or confounding medical factors, and therefore must be interpreted with caution. The relationship between tinnitus-related distress and hair-BDNF levels should be explored further to obtain a better understanding of stress-related effects in chronic tinnitus.
目前,尚无客观指标可用于衡量慢性(困扰性)耳鸣的治疗效果。本研究探讨在慢性耳鸣患者头发样本中检测到的与压力相关的生物标志物皮质醇和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)在紧凑多模式耳鸣特异性认知行为治疗后是否发生变化。
在这项纵向研究中,对80例慢性耳鸣患者在治疗前及5天治疗后的3个月,评估了头发皮质醇和头发BDNF水平、自我报告的耳鸣相关困扰(耳鸣问卷;TQ)以及感知压力(感知压力问卷;PSQ-20)。采用带有向后剔除的线性混合效应模型评估治疗引起的变化,并使用交叉滞后面板模型(结构方程模型)对TQ与头发BDNF之间的时间关联进行额外的探索性分析。
随访时,观察到TQ(P<0.001)和PSQ-20评分降低(P=0.045),这不受基线头发皮质醇或头发BDNF水平的影响。治疗后生物标志物水平未观察到变化。探索性分析初步表明,随访时基线TQ评分对头发BDNF水平的定向效应(趋势;P=0.070)比基线头发BDNF水平对随访时TQ评分的相反定向效应(无显著性差异)更有可能。
虽然该治疗有效降低了慢性耳鸣患者的耳鸣相关困扰和感知压力,但这种效果并未反映在生物学变化中。然而,头发皮质醇和头发BDNF水平缺乏变化可能受到治疗持续时间、随访间隔或混杂医学因素的影响,因此必须谨慎解释。应进一步探索耳鸣相关困扰与头发BDNF水平之间的关系,以更好地理解慢性耳鸣中与压力相关的效应。